RE: The mullah’s terrorist general was plotting right inside Iraq directly after the attack on the US Embassy.
That was Tucker’s point. The above information was fed to us by our intelligence, which, according to Tucker, we cannot trust because it is part of the Deep State.
He seems to be telling us that Soleimani was NOT plotting any additional attacks on our embassy. Does he tell us why we should believe this? Nope. Just trust what he says and distrust what our intelligence tells is.
That’s what I get from his tirade.
“RE: The mullah’s terrorist general was plotting right inside Iraq directly after the attack on the US Embassy.
That was Tucker’s point.”
Yes, Tulsi Carlson’s point is moot. That’s MY point.
The Mullah terrorist general came to Baghdad for reasons, none of them good.
He’s a military combatant who engaged with US forces through his directed militias for years.
For years!
What part of this do people not get? Tulsi Carlson is being a buffoon and I don’t care how stupid and dense he wants to be on this topic. It’s over and the best thing in the region in years.
Many victims of Soleimani in Iraq, Iran, Syria, Yemen and Libya will agree. They number in the hundreds of thousands.
What's the possible "dual use" excuse on this one that our intelligence is missing?
-PJ