Replies

Here, I fixed it to make it fair:

Fox News journalist Peter Doocy challenged Biden about his criticism of President Donald Trump's decision to order the killing of Iranian military commander Qasem Soleimani. Doocy asked Biden if he would be willing, as commander-in-chief, to thwart an "imminent attack on Americans" by using an airstrike to kill a "terrorist leader." (Trump claimed on Friday, without providing evidence, that Soleimani was planning a "very major attack.") "Well, we did," said Biden without providing evidence, who served as vice president to Obama. "The guy's name was Osama bin Laden." Doocy responded, "Didn't you tell President Obama not to go after bin Laden that day?" To which Biden responded without providing evidence: "No, I didn't. I didn't." Biden's description of his advice to Obama changed between 2012 and 2015; two of his accounts were contradictory. He said in 2012 that he had advised Obama "don't go" with the raid before obtaining more information without providing evidence. He then said in 2015 that he had not uttered this "don't go" opinion. Former top officials in the Obama administration have written in their memoirs without providing evidencethat Biden was "against the operation," that he was "firmly in favor of waiting for more information," and that he was concerned about the risks of a raid.

That phrase, oddly enough, never seemed to follow a statement from Hillary Clinton on the CNN network. i.e. "My emails were hacked by Russians", Hillary claimed on Friday, without providing evidence....

and so forth...