Double Exposure: The Dems Coddling of Criminals and Iranian Terrorists

American Thinker ^ | Jan 5, 2020 | Clarice Feldman

[upchuck]

This week, the Democrats have been revealed as the party that exposes us to (1) criminal mayhem (often anti-Semitic) on the streets of New York and (2) terrorism everywhere as they consistently ignored it, indeed, paid off the perpetrators with pallets of airlifted unmarked bills and praised the worst of its perpetrators. The President has the magical power, it seems, to get idiots and criminals to expose themselves.

Mayhem on the Streets of NY

Beginning on the first of this year, New York's “no bail no jail” law, enacted by the Democratic legislature and put into law by Governor Andrew Cuomo went into effect. The law allows those arrested for a large variety of crimes, including some that create serious consequences for others -- like third-degree assault, making terrorist threats, selling firearms to minors, money laundering to support terrorism and grand larceny -- to be released immediately on no bail. One assumes if they later refuse to appear for a court hearing they might well also be released on their own say-so. The new law provides that hindering prosecution, after all, is a no-bail crime...

[upchuck]

Other topics Clarice covers this week:

- Precision bombings in Iraq Expose the Democrats’ Love Affair with Iranian Terrorism

- Fear of Reprisals by Iran are Overblown

Knock 'em dead Clarice!

[mountainlion]

Dems cuddling up to illegals, criminals and terrorists is just a professional courtesy.

[chuckee]

Democrats are born with a learning disability. They are beyond remedial classes. AOC is a prime example that nothing works with them. If she wasn’t elected to Congress she would probably have been fired as a bartender for peeing in the drinks when they ran out of club soda mixer. At least she was above and beyond conscientious about her job

[cranked]

Hmmm, let me see here - most libtard progressives (Antifa, politicians, etc.) are criminals, hmmmm, some can easily be ascribed as domestic terrorists; therefore, their “coddling” of criminals and terrorists seems, hmm, natural? /s

[butlerweave]

Dems taking bribes and or kickbacks from the Iranians also ?

[StormEye]

"Dems taking bribes and or kickbacks from the Iranians also ?"

You know it happens.
(Where does Obama get his money?)

[jazusamo]

To the Democrats’ bleats that they weren’t consulted (it would have been like sending alerts to the ayatollahs) they’ve searched through their Oughta be a Law books to complain that the attacks were not approved by Congress. I don’t recall this argument when Obama launched 2,800 strikes on Iraq and Syria. In any event, the Pentagon reports that in the real law book, the present airstrikes were authorized by 10 U.S. Code Sec. 127e as support of special operations to combat terrorism.

Another excellent piece by Clarice!

I love the way she cuts through the Dems phony outrage and states the simple facts.