This is so fun;)
1 posted on
12/28/2019 6:48:26 PM PST by
mdittmar
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-29 next last
Eric Ciaramella
Where are you coming from?
Eric Ciaramella
Nobody knows who you are
2 posted on
12/28/2019 6:51:07 PM PST by
Olog-hai
("No Republican, no matter how liberal, is going to woo a Democratic vote." -- Ronald Reagan, 1960)
To: mdittmar
All the whistle blower law does is legalize a Deep State Coup.
3 posted on
12/28/2019 6:51:14 PM PST by
CMailBag
To: mdittmar
ERIC CIARAMELLA
PASS IT ON
4 posted on
12/28/2019 6:51:51 PM PST by
A_Former_Democrat
(Guns up . . . We cominÂ’ PS: Eric The Blower Ciaramella. PASS IT ON)
To: mdittmar
So how can you break the law if you dont know the identity of the weasel blower?
6 posted on
12/28/2019 6:54:28 PM PST by
missnry
(The truth will set you free ... and drive liberals crazy!)
To: mdittmar
Why did they change the whistle blower statute for this traitor? Why is this not an issue???
7 posted on
12/28/2019 6:54:47 PM PST by
JerseyDvl
("If you're going through hell, keep going.")
To: mdittmar
The MSM operates like a bad spy novel. Anyone who knows anything has already heard the name of the deepstate operative being called a whistle blower. And the MSM is well aware of that.
8 posted on
12/28/2019 6:55:05 PM PST by
Revel
To: mdittmar
He’s not a whistleblower. He is a coup participant.
To: mdittmar
The account shows some indications of automation, including an unusually high amount of activity and profile pictures featuring stock images from the internet. Yet it took 2-3 years for Twitter to get rid of the Krassenbots - even though everyone on the Right knew they were automated.
This is always the claim from the Twitter Lefties.
Everyone on the Right on Twitter is a Russian bot.
13 posted on
12/28/2019 7:02:31 PM PST by
kiryandil
(Chris Wallace: Because someone has to drive the Clown Car)
To: mdittmar
This is the first time I’ve seen AP (or any of the other fake news outlets) try to find out if a twitter poster is a bot.
They usually consider a twitter post an unimpeachable ( sorry for the pun) source.
14 posted on
12/28/2019 7:02:33 PM PST by
PhiloBedo
(You gotta roll with the punches, and get with what's real.)
To: mdittmar
I don’t think he is the one that removed it, because it’s not the only tweet missing. I think twitter is censoring him.
His account was also down for a short time yesterday.
15 posted on
12/28/2019 7:03:34 PM PST by
kara37
To: mdittmar
16 posted on
12/28/2019 7:07:04 PM PST by
gaijin
To: mdittmar
To: mdittmar
I dont think its Ciamarella, or if it is, hes a representative of a larger group of people, any one of whom could stand in for him if circumstances were right.
John Bolton is the main problem.
24 posted on
12/28/2019 7:13:31 PM PST by
Jim Noble
(There is nothing racist in stating plainly what most people already know)
To: mdittmar
The real truth is....He is NOT entitled to anonymity given the circumstance.
To: mdittmar
Try this next time Mr. President
26 posted on
12/28/2019 7:16:06 PM PST by
ElkGroveDan
(My tagline is in the shop.)
To: mdittmar
An entire article about President Trump’s tweet without actually stating the contents of the tweet.
30 posted on
12/28/2019 7:20:15 PM PST by
unlearner
(Be ready for war.)
To: mdittmar
I stopped reading after this lie;
“Unmasking the whistleblower, who works in the intelligence field, could violate federal protection laws that have historically been supported by both parties.”
The only person not allowed to “unmask” the fake whistleblower is the ICIG.
31 posted on
12/28/2019 7:24:19 PM PST by
usnavy_cop_retired
(Retiree in the P.I. living as a legal immigrant)
To: mdittmar
Old man: Ciaramella, Ciaramella, Ciaramella!!!
{Lady with beard throws stone.}
Temple Official: Right. NOBODY throws a stone until I whistle blow. Even if I myself say Ciaramella!
33 posted on
12/28/2019 7:30:26 PM PST by
Alas Babylon!
(The prisons do not fill themselves. Get moving, Barr!)
To: mdittmar
Note the “whistleblower law” was changed right before EC blew the whistle.
Changing that law could be construed as “bill of attainder” - enacted precisely for the purpose of harming one person in particular. I’d like to see a legal analysis of the timeline of that change vs the timeline of “the call” and subsequent “whistleblowing”.
34 posted on
12/28/2019 7:33:14 PM PST by
ctdonath2
(Democrats oppose democracy.)
To: mdittmar
How does the media know that so-and-so is ‘The Whistleblower’?
43 posted on
12/28/2019 7:52:21 PM PST by
BobL
(I drive a pickup truck to work because it makes me feel like a man.)
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-29 next last
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson