The Chief Justice has not moved to reform the FISA court, for which he is personally and totally responsible. This alone precludes him from sitting at the Trump impeachment in the Senate. He is a fact witness to the corruption the Senate case must investigate.
The Chief Justice has not moved to reform the FISA court, for which he is personally and totally responsible. This alone precludes him from sitting at the Trump impeachment in the Senate. He is a fact witness to the corruption the Senate case must investigate.
Then Roberts should have to resign his position on the SC.
Agreed. This Bush appointed justice rewrote ObamaCare for the sole purpose to give it SC approval! Since when is it the purview of the SC to write/rewrite law?
And, as you state, he is THE man in-charge of the FISC. Nunes filed his notice to the FISC two years ago. Roberts was well aware of this and the evidence Nunes provided. Roberts and the FISC did nothing.
Now, after the IG report the chief FISC judge issues a weak response and Roberts is completely MIA on the entire debacle. Now some may say well he’s quietly waiting for the case against FISC to unfold.
If it was justice Thomas I would entertain this. But, because it’s ObamaCare Roberts I do not give him this benefit of the doubt. I simply do not trust that man at all.
If Chief Justice Roberts recused himself, the most senior Justice on the court would replace him to oversee the Senate Trial. That Justice would be none other than.......
Justice Clarence Thomas
The Democrats would lose their minds. Racist attacks against him would be everywhere. Obama Judges, Bush Judges and Clinton Judges would be a thing again. Pelosi would issue a statement that impeachment was on hold until Thomas was off the court. The House might even impeach Thomas and demand Ginsberg oversee the case.
Absolutely correct