Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: SeekAndFind
2. The Senate could begin a trial and, thereafter, could end it whenever the Senate majority deems it has heard enough and calls for a vote. Such a vote would be called when the Senate majority is confident that a supermajority of 67 senators — two-thirds of the Senate — would not vote to convict;

Why a two thirds majority? They only need one third plus one to ensure no conviction.

7 posted on 12/24/2019 8:27:55 PM PST by 17th Miss Regt
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


To: 17th Miss Regt

Maybe it’s like a criminal jury. Conviction or acquittal must both meet a certain number of votes. Anything in between is a hung jury.


9 posted on 12/24/2019 8:36:59 PM PST by Still Thinking (Freedom is NOT a loophole!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies ]

To: 17th Miss Regt
Nice catch. As usual, the Fake News Media has it exactly backwards. It would take 67 votes TO convict.

The FNM And demonicRATS are always playing heads I win, tails you lose.

10 posted on 12/24/2019 8:37:54 PM PST by Texas Eagle (If it wasn't for double-standards, Liberals would have no standards at all -- Texas Eagle)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson