[norwaypinesavage]

"If it is even remotely true that a Santa Anna statue was EVEN considered-— then little brown Bush is far more than toasted. He’s burnt toast."

It is not even remotely true. The article is poorly written, and if you don't read it very carefully, it can lead you to think it is true.

George P. Bush never even considered putting a statue of Santa Anna at the Alamo. What he plans to do is renovate and move a nearby monument honoring the lives of the Alamo defenders to a more prominent location within the Alamo compound. No one who knows the facts could argue with that.

The posts here quoting a sentence from the article stating that Bush wants a statue of Santa Anna are quoting a tweet posted by a Bush hating group that is a false statement. Careful reading of the article will prove it is false.

[TMN78247]

Some Conservatives will believe ANYTHING, no matte rhow unlikely, that makes the Bush family LOOK bad.

I’m an Alamo Shrine docent & this is BRAVO SIERRA. = While I’m “no particular fan” of George P Bush, this is ABSURD & NONSENSE.

Part of the “fake new problem” concerning our Alamo Shrine is that numerous “commercial interests” here in San Antonio are trying ANY TACTIC to stop us from RESTORING the Alamo battle site to its original size & appearance.

Note: We are now about 95% sure that the site of the funeral pyre, where our Texican martyrs were burned, has been found.
(IF that site is PROVEN correct, I for just one of many Texicans want a memorial built/dedicated there & the “modern constructions” torn down.)

Yours, TMN78247

[mrsmith]

Thanks.