Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: olesigh
Nasty pelosi has not delivered the case nor the managers to present the case. Rush is talking about it right now. Until the impeachment is delivered to the senate it is not a legal impeachmet.
18 posted on 12/20/2019 9:18:38 AM PST by mountainlion (Live well for those that did not make it back.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies ]


When do we force her to take a competency test? She thinks we are still in the Paris agreement.


21 posted on 12/20/2019 9:20:41 AM PST by proust (Justice delayed is injustice.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 18 | View Replies ]

To: mountainlion

[[Until the impeachment is delivered to the senate it is not a legal impeachment.]]

I believe it is a legal impeachment- BUT a false impeachment at that- People are putting too much emphasis on the actual impeachment because impeachments are or rather should be worthless without a senate conviction- anyone can be accused of anything- and when you don’t get bipartisan support for an impeachment, that just proves that there wasn’t a case to be made to actually truly impeach someone- only when an impeachment is solidified by a senate trial and conviction should an impeachment carry any actual weight- but the fact is, he was legally impeached technically- even though the impeachment didn’t follow any established guidelines, and was a travesty of justice seeings how it was entirely partisan-


55 posted on 12/20/2019 9:49:34 AM PST by Bob434
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 18 | View Replies ]

To: mountainlion

not true. Do you think Trump and his advisors are wrong.

When the house voted, Clinton was impeached immediately and the congress came on the lawn and had good cry.

There’ no definition of impeachment that says he’s not impeached after the vote.

Top believe you Trump, limbaugh Breitbart, the Washington times, The WSJ, and number of other conservative hosts and writers are all wrong.

Hundreds of reports yesterday said he is the third president to be impeached.

One prof from Harvard said no and everyone here, especially those who criticized proofs at the nadler hearing, all of a sudden went harvard and ran with it.

But I don[t want to stop the spin here.

Carry on if it floats your boat.


65 posted on 12/20/2019 9:58:43 AM PST by olesigh
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 18 | View Replies ]

To: mountainlion

Once again this is redundant there are 10s of thousand sources that prove you and the guy from Harvard wrong. Just take Trump. Breitbart, and Limbaugh and the WSJ’s word for it.

William Murphy, Professor of American History, specializing in political history
Answered Oct 3
The distinction you’re making here — that being an “impeached president” is some kind of specialized status — is wrong.

Impeachment is the act of bringing charges against the President by the U.S. House of Representatives. Once those charges — formally called Articles of Impeachment — have been passed by a majority vote in the House, the President has been impeached.


https://time.com/5552679/impeached-presidents/


I guess trump calling himself impeached means he and his advisors are idiots in your mind.
https://www.history.com/topics/us-government/impeachment-in-us-history

I guess trump calling himself impeached means he and his advisors are idiots in your mind.
https://www.history.com/topics/us-government/impeachment-in-us-history


https://www.thoughtco.com/impeachment-the-unthinkable-process-3322171


https://www.heritage.org/political-process/commentary/trump-impeachment-hinges-whether-he-had-corrupt-intent-taking-lawful


120 posted on 12/20/2019 4:46:48 PM PST by olesigh
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 18 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson