Posted on 12/20/2019 4:39:59 AM PST by SeekAndFind
Like many evangelicals, I have great respect for Christianity Today. It remains a hallmark, evangelical publication. And although it has leaned leftward in some respects in recent years, it is quite conservative compared to far-left evangelical publications like Jim Wallis Sojourners. So, it represents a serious moment when Mark Galli, the editor in chief of Christianity Today (henceforth CT), writing on behalf of the publication, calls for Trumps removal.
Galli recalls Billy Grahams vision in founding CT, namely, that the magazine will help evangelical Christians interpret the news in a manner that reflects their faith. And while CT normally does not focus on political issues, recognizing the diversity within evangelicalism, it welcomes Christians from across the political spectrum, and reminds everyone that politics is not the end and purpose of our being.
Nonetheless, the impeachment of the president calls for comment, and so Galli will share his thoughts with conviction and love.
After affirming CTs love and prayers for President Trump, Galli recognizes how the Democrats have had it out for [Trump] from day one, acknowledging the partisan, even unfair nature of the impeachment hearings.
Nonetheless, he writes, the facts in this instance are unambiguous: The president of the United States attempted to use his political power to coerce a foreign leader to harass and discredit one of the presidents political opponents. That is not only a violation of the Constitution; more importantly, it is profoundly immoral.
Why is it, then, that many evangelicals are not shocked by this? It is because this president has dumbed down the idea of morality in his administration.
Not only so, but [h]is Twitter feed alonewith its habitual string of mischaracterizations, lies, and slandersis a near perfect example of a human being who is morally lost and confused.
On this basis, Galli argues, Trump should be removed, and no amount of good that he has done can justify his continuing in office with our support. Rather, The impeachment hearings have illuminated the presidents moral deficiencies for all to see. This damages the institution of the presidency, damages the reputation of our country, and damages both the spirit and the future of our people. None of the presidents positives can balance the moral and political danger we face under a leader of such grossly immoral character.
Back in 1998, CT said of then-impeached President Clinton, Unsavory dealings and immoral acts by the President and those close to him have rendered this administration morally unable to lead.
Consistency calls for them to say the same thing today about President Trump.
And then this impassioned plea: To the many evangelicals who continue to support Mr. Trump in spite of his blackened moral record, we might say this: Remember who you are and whom you serve. Consider how your justification of Mr. Trump influences your witness to your Lord and Savior. Consider what an unbelieving world will say if you continue to brush off Mr. Trumps immoral words and behavior in the cause of political expediency. If we dont reverse course now, will anyone take anything we say about justice and righteousness with any seriousness for decades to come? Can we say with a straight face that abortion is a great evil that cannot be tolerated and, with the same straight face, say that the bent and broken character of our nations leader doesnt really matter in the end?
How should we respond?
First, Im glad that Galli spoke his mind as an evangelical leader on behalf of CT. Surely, he echoes the sentiments of many others, and the Church and world need to hear this perspective too.
Its true that this also speaks of disunity within our ranks. But where it is written that we must have political unity to be one in Christ? That we must have the same view of the president to stand together for the larger cause of the Gospel?
As Ive said many times before, when we stand before God on that day, He will ask us what we have done with Jesus, not what we have done with Trump.
Im aware, of course, of how the secular media will spin this. Gallis editorial will be used to deepen the divide between us.
It will be used to make rejection of Trump a litmus test for true evangelical Christianity. (Ironically, in other circles, it is support of Trump that serves as a litmus test of ones true faith.) It will be used to discourage evangelicals from voting for Trump, if not to shame them for voting for him.
But again, because a substantial minority of evangelicals concur with Gallis words, they needed to be spoken.
Second, there are many evangelicals who do not believe the Democratic charges against Trump and who see the impeachment as a witch hunt and a sham. (See this article from my Stream colleague John Zmirak for a clear, philosophical perspective.) In their minds, the charges are hardly unambiguous. Quite the contrary.
If, then, the president did not abuse his power as president, does Galli believe that Trump should be removed from office because of his offensive tweets and comments?
It is one thing to urge evangelicals to say, Lets put forward an alternate candidate during the Republican primaries who will more closely mirror our values. It is another thing to say the president should be removed from office. For what, based on the Constitution?
Third, I share Gallis concern that we evangelicals can seem more closely aligned with the president than with the Lord, something I have written and spoken about time and again. (Most recently, see here.) Have we sold our integrity and our ethics in support of a strong-willed president who fights for our sacred causes and gets in the trenches on our behalf?
At the same time, we are fooling ourselves if we think that the world will suddenly listen to us if we call for Trumps removal. Not a chance.
Mark Galli might be the talk of left-wing media today (which, I do not believe was his goal in writing). But tomorrow they will view him as just another bigoted, hateful, homophobic, misogynist who opposes womens rights and believes in an antiquated book.
He wonders if anyone will take anything we say about justice and righteousness with any seriousness for decades to come if we dont seek to remove Trump. The answer is that it depends on how we conduct ourselves.
We can support the president for the very real good he does do, much of it on behalf of causes that are of great importance to evangelicals. Religious liberty really does matter. Protecting babies in the womb really does matter. Helping the poor get better jobs really does matter. These, too, are issues of justice and righteousness.
We simply need to be consistent when it comes to our ethics, meaning, we call balls and strikes with fairness and impartiality, and we call for ethical behavior as loudly as we call for righteous legislation. Why cant we do both?
I agree with Galli that, under the current administration, there has been a dumbing down of the idea of morality. And its true that many evangelicals now wink at things that once grieved them, thankful to have a man like Trump who will stand up and fight (many would say, Finally!).
But that doesnt mean we remove him for his alleged dumbing down of morality. It means we are careful not to lose our own morality in the process.
Fourth, I believe those on Gallis side need to listen to Trump-supporting evangelicals who feel that, despite his evident shortcomings, the man has been a God-send.
During a recent trip to California, a pastor spoke to me about the very real threat to religious liberties Christians were facing there, among other, major problems. He was convinced that, with Hillary Clinton as president, irreparable damage would have been done and that Trump has served as a strong anti-Hillary leader.
Like a wedge in the door, I suggested to him, and he agreed.
But he also agreed that the wedge can only do so much. Only the Church, through the Gospel and with Gods empowerment, can open the door and turn the tide.
That is where we must put our emphasis: living as Jesus would have us live, with politics an important and yet much more distant priority for most of us.
My proposal today for my fellow evangelicals is this. Let us each humble ourselves before God and pray, Father, what is Your heart in all this? And what would you have me do? Show me my blind spots, and strengthen my convictions when they reflect yours. I only want Your will.
Then, lets have honest conversations with our brothers and sisters who differ with us, starting with this: Please share your perspective with me. I want to understand where youre coming from.
Then, when theyre done and youve heard their heart, ask if you can share yours.
Finally, go back to prayer and meditation on the Word.
The stakes are very high, and our nation is dangerously divided. Let us be sure that, as Gods people, we do not follow suit.
Dr. Michael Brown (www.askdrbrown.org) is the host of the nationally syndicated Line of Fire radio program.
It was written by somebody who was on their way out of the magazine. Complete deception by the author.
Those Christians who go leftward are on the slippery slope to apostasy.
Galli is typical of many christian “leaders” today, out of touch, lacking in wisdom. Wisdom comes from the Lord.
The church in general has become very liberal & polluted. Embracing positions that 50 years ago many would consider unbiblical. Liberalism and Marxism are diseases
How queer Mark doesn’t have an editorial to call out Nancy Pelosi (who has invoked her Catholic identity in this mess)?
Lies, slurs, abuse of power, collusion...
Gallo is a short-timer, leaving in January.
Wonder if he got a going away gift for doing this.
Galli...
The better words are fallen away or apostate. Holding a form of godliness but denying the power thereof.
From Franklin Graham:
My Response to Christianity Today:
Christianity Today released an editorial stating that President Trump should be removed from officeand they invoked my fathers name (I suppose to try to bring legitimacy to their statements), so I feel it is important for me to respond. Yes, my father Billy Graham founded Christianity Today; but no, he would not agree with their opinion piece. In fact, he would be very disappointed. I have not previously shared who my father voted for in the past election, but because of this article, I feel it is necessary to share it now. My father knew Donald Trump, he believed in Donald Trump, and he voted for Donald Trump. He believed that Donald J. Trump was the man for this hour in history for our nation.
For Christianity Today to side with the Democrat Party in a totally partisan attack on the President of the United States is unfathomable. Christianity Today failed to acknowledge that not one single Republican voted with the Democrats to impeach the President. I know a number of Republicans in Congress, and many of them are strong Christians. If the President were guilty of what the Democrats claimed, these Republicans would have joined with the Democrats to impeach him. But the Democrats were not even unanimoustwo voted against impeachment and one voted present. This impeachment was politically motivated, 100% partisan. Why would Christianity Today choose to take the side of the Democrat left whose only goal is to discredit and smear the name of a sitting president? They want readers to believe the Democrat leadership rather than believe the President of the United States.
Look at all the President has accomplished in a very short time. The economy of our nation is the strongest it has been in 50 years, ISIS & the caliphate have been defeated, and the President has renegotiated trade deals to benefit all Americans. The list of accomplishments is long, but for me as a Christian, the fact that he is the most pro-life president in modern history is extremely importantand Christianity Today wants us to ignore that, to say it doesnt count? The President has been a staunch defender of religious freedom at home and around the worldand Christianity Today wants us to ignore that? Also the President has appointed conservative judges in record numberand Christianity today wants us to ignore that? Christianity Today feels he should be removed from office because of false accusations that the President emphatically denies.
Christianity Today said its time to call a spade a spade. The spade is thisChristianity Today has been used by the left for their political agenda. Its obvious that Christianity Today has moved to the left and is representing the elitist liberal wing of evangelicalism.
Is President Trump guilty of sin? Of course he is, as were all past presidents and as each one of us are, including myself. Therefore, lets pray for the President as he continues to lead the affairs of our nation.
This drivel is on par with the impeachment sham. CT is all about power, influence and making money. So are the democrats.
Trump goes after corruption everywhere.
Sadly the author of this piece is in a position to influence some of the people of God...This author is dishonest and spouting the same lies that come from the father of lies...He is not deceived; he’s a deceiver...
Mr. Galli seems to have no problem with people (Dems and media) who bare false witness. It is obvious the man cannot diagram a sentence, and read an entire transcript to conflate getting to the bottom of corruption with personal political gain. He puts himself in the place of God by acting as though he knows the President’s motives.
His initial premise on Trumps Ukrainian phone call is totally inaccurate. It does nothing ore than parrot the lefts lie. He apparently does not know how to read a transcript.
So glad to see him come out immediately and slap the writer upside the head...metaphorically of course.
Thanks for sharing that. Maybe that letter even deserves it’s own thread.
Won’t see this rag in my house again.
https://www.christianitytoday.com/ct/help/contactus.html
I’m planning on BLASTING them about their hit piece on Trump I’ve included the like, have fun....
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.