Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Democratic debate in jeopardy amid labor disputes as candidates express frustration over 'artificially narrowed' field
Fox News ^ | 12/15/2019 | Andrew O’Reilly

Posted on 12/16/2019 9:01:04 AM PST by Olog-hai

Controversy continues to roil this week’s upcoming Democratic presidential primary debate in Los Angeles amid an ongoing labor dispute, anger over the tightening qualification standards and discontent with Democratic National Committee Chairman Tom Perez.

The debate, which was originally slated to be held at the University of California, Los Angeles (UCLA), was moved to Loyola Marymount University after AFSCME Local 3299 — the union representing more than 25,000 University of California service and patient technical care workers — and the state school forced UCLA to inform the Democrats and its media partners to abandon plans to host the debate at the Luskin School of Public Affairs.

But another labor dispute at Loyola Marymount University is now once again threatening the December 19 debate and the top Democratic primary candidates are threatening to boycott the event if they have to cross a picket line to get to the stage.

A labor union called UNITE HERE Local 11 says it will picket outside the event, and Massachusetts Sen. Elizabeth Warren and Vermont Sen. Bernie Sanders responded by tweeting they wouldn’t participate if that meant crossing it. Former Vice President Joe Biden, Mayor Pete Buttigieg of South Bend, Ind.; Minnesota Sen. Amy Klobuchar, environmental activist Tom Steyer and businessman Andrew Yang followed suit. …

(Excerpt) Read more at foxnews.com ...


TOPICS: Culture/Society; Politics/Elections
KEYWORDS: 201912; 20191219; afscme; andrewyang; buttigeig; debate; democrats; joebiden; klobuchar; local11; losangeles; sanders; tomsteyer; ucla; unitehere; uniteherelocal11; warren
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-24 last
To: Dilbert San Diego

“Didn’t the field get narrowed down by a combination of :. Support as measured in public opinion polls, and support as measured in contributions received?”

indeed. but there was no affirmative action rule for unpopular candidates, hence the putative “artificial narrowing” claim ...


21 posted on 12/16/2019 12:00:17 PM PST by catnipman (Cat Nipman: Vote Republican in 2012 and only be called racist one more time!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: Olog-hai

Warren-—Bernie—Steyer are hard core proponents of EVERY job in the USA be a UNION JOB.

The irony of this dust up is delicious.


22 posted on 12/16/2019 12:22:18 PM PST by ridesthemiles
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Zathras

“Jeb Bush could run as a Democrat.
He is for sure stupid enough to jump in.”

He’s to slow to jump in.


23 posted on 12/16/2019 12:31:48 PM PST by Leep (It's.. (W)all or nothing..!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies]

To: Olog-hai

all of this doesn’t really matter because Hillary is going to be the candidate.


24 posted on 12/16/2019 12:33:49 PM PST by Leep (It's.. (W)all or nothing..!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-24 last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson