I was all excited. Then I saw it was GP. :(
*****************
If seems that everytime GP posts something to give us hope, a critic arises to trash the source. Are they really that bad? Any examples of how they really mess-up? Should FR’s editors ban GP?
re they really that bad?
They could improve their reputation, but I’ve noticed more and more that when I see a story like this that seems to finally nail the D’s, it turns out to be from GP, and I never hear or see anything from any other sources. So I’m very skeptical.
If it confirmed by other reliable sources, e.g. Conservative treehouse, etc., I’ll give GP the credit.
The sources in this case are real Rudy tweets. The fact that it's GP sourcing the tweets is irrelevant.