However, I think voters approach a mayoral contest and a congressional seat with different things in mind. Giuliani won out of the desperation for voters to feel safe just from walking home at night or walking the dog. The city was completely degraded in many ways and is a lot different from asking a vote for someone who will support Trump in the House. The district includes Greenwich Village and has the largest concentration of the Jewish vote in the country.
For Santa Monica, this district is home to many of the Hollywood elite and is also the land of ballot harvesting. Instead, I see, Schiff having a parade and hero worshipped.
And for San Francisco, how does one of the most liberal districts in the country turn out a sitting Speaker? I think she is very effective in that she keeps her troops in line (AOC is the exception), they vote as told and pass the legislation they want. As opposed to the waffling Ryan who was always seen in a war between two factions of a party.
I just looked up each district out of curiosity. The NY 10th, Nadler won with 82% of the vote in 2018 and the republican won the balance. For 2020, no republicans are running at this time, but there are 4 other democrats running in the democrat primary. AOC has promised to run other candidates against sitting members and I think Nadler is one of those targeted by her, but with 4 primary opponents, they will split the vote, so Nadler should win the nomination easily.
Without all the detail, I looked up the Cook Partisan Index for each congressional seat. For Pelosi CA-12, it is D +37 which means it is 37 points more democrat than the nation as a whole; Schiff CA-28 - D +28; NY-10 - it is D +26.
I appreciate your enthusiasm, but I don't see a groundswell of NY and CA voters turning on their icons and seating a candidate who will support Trump.