The jury will never hear your recording because it was obtained illegally.
The best you could do would be go to the press that is already in the FIB’s pocket.
The best you could do would be go to the press that is already in the FIB’s pocket.
If that’s the route to go, then that’s the route to go. I’ve been in the interview rooms, conducting interviews with guys charged with all sorts of felonies, and they’ve all been recorded. Gone are the days of hiding the pinhole camera in the clock, as there’s no reason to hide it. If nothing else, it keeps the cops honest.
Anywho....I speak for me. I don’t care how it’s obtained. In this day and age, whether the MSM would do anything with it, is a moot point. Within a day or less, the recording and the documented lying of a federal agent would be all over the internet. Again. It’s something I would do.
But, as I stated when I first posted, if you told them you wanted a lawyer present and wanted to record the interview, they’ll more than likely take a, hard pass on that. There would be no way to reconcile any differences in “their report writing”, from “notes” taken during the interview, to the actual recording. They don’t like that.
Wrong.
The Supremes have held that public employees have no expectation of privacy while on the job. Ex: recording cops.