To: Yo-Yo
[Do you for one second believe that South Korea would willingly go over to China?
Before that ever happened, they would probably enter into a mutual assistance treaty with Japan and possibly with Taiwan, Indonesia, or even Australia and/or New Zealand, forming a new and meaningful SEATO organization.]
Alliances are not an easy thing to form or sustain. US alliances have survived for almost 80 years because the US was always willing to be the lender of last resort, the power willing to assume the lion’s share of the burden. I don’t see any other country in the world that is willing to take on that responsibility. It’s a big ask, and an impossible one in the Orient.
61 posted on
11/20/2019 10:31:42 AM PST by
Zhang Fei
(My dad had a Delta 88. That was a car. It was like driving your living room.)
To: Zhang Fei
That type of an alliance would require significant naval assets. No one other then the US has that.
62 posted on
11/20/2019 10:33:42 AM PST by
Reily
To: Zhang Fei
China basically wants their own “Greater East Asian Co-Prosperity Sphere”
63 posted on
11/20/2019 10:33:47 AM PST by
dfwgator
(Endut! Hoch Hech!)
To: Zhang Fei
RE: US was always willing to be the lender of last resort, the power willing to assume the lions share of the burden.
Isn’t China already doing that?
However, if you can’t pay back your debts, there are conditions, like China taking over your ports ( see Sri Lanka ).
66 posted on
11/20/2019 10:42:17 AM PST by
SeekAndFind
(look at Michigan, it will)
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson