Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: BlackFemaleArmyColonel

I was disappointed that Starr would draw conclusions even before he heard a cross examination. That is very unprofessional for any attorney, but I guess standard procedure for a TV attorney.


106 posted on 11/20/2019 9:45:16 AM PST by richardtavor
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies ]


To: richardtavor
I was disappointed that Starr would draw conclusions even before he heard a cross examination. That is very unprofessional for any attorney, but I guess standard procedure for a TV attorney.

Ken Starr is right now on Fox backing down because Starr is saying the ambassador Sondland made a shocking omission in his previous testimony about Trump saying "no quid pro quo"

. Starr felt Sondland should have said in Sondland's opening statement Trump said no quid pro quo I don't want anything from the Ukraine. - Tom

116 posted on 11/20/2019 10:24:48 AM PST by Capt. Tom
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 106 | View Replies ]

To: richardtavor

I agree! But Starr was misquoted because if you hear that clip he’s saying what Schiff would be saying! Still Ken Starr was SO inaccurate and you always wait for cross examination! GAWD I HATE THESE PEOPLE!

Listen to Mark Levin on his radio show or podcast tonight if you want the truth. He’s livid!


119 posted on 11/20/2019 10:32:19 AM PST by BlueHorseShoe
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 106 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson