Posted on 11/20/2019 6:05:06 AM PST by maggief
Gordon Sondland, the U.S. ambassador to the European Union, will testify before the House Intelligence Committee on Wednesday, Nov. 20, as part of the impeachment probe into President Donald Trump.
(Excerpt) Read more at youtube.com ...
Starr should be in jail for what happened at Baylor.
Once articles of impeachment are approved, it automatically goes to the Senate. McConnell says he will take them up. No delay.
“This has got to be more then 15 additional minutes”
Yesterday it was 15 minutes each side,today he gave 30 minutes each side . But here is something interesting. The witness has an afternoon flight to catch and it is going to be very close. We might get robbed of the complete 5 minute round questioning because of this hour delay Schiff just threw in.
On purpose I wonder?
The omission of POTUS’ comment from Sondland’s opening statement, wanting “nothing from Ukraine”, changes his mind.
I’m certain Starr will change his mind again.
This is so silly. Trump directly told him no to what he assumed anyway. No one ever told him it was true. He assumed what no one knew. Ridiculous.
“it seems that Starr, of anybody, should know we don’t go to the verdict right after the prosecution gives their opening statement”
Maybe Starr is hoping for Trump to go down, and was just waiting for a reason and then jump on it. If so, he jumped, and he jumped too soon.
ewwwww ... Chris Wallace on now.
Dan Bongino
Candid assessment:
Started off as a decent day for the hoax-promoting Democrats. Yet, as the day has worn on it’s morphed into another disastrous day for the impeachment hoaxers. Memorable quote from today from Sondland regarding the POTUS “I want NOTHING.”
I don’t care. But it seems many here are all twitterpated over it
“Started off as a decent day for the hoax-promoting Democrats. Yet, as the day has worn on it’s morphed into another disastrous day for the impeachment hoaxers.”
Agree. What are the Pearl-Cluthers going to do now?
“If that’s how you want to describe law enforcement with RICO, ok.”
Nice try. I guess you are unaware that law enforcement — and the DA falls under that term — use informants, plants, infiltrators, and flippers, etc. to bring organized crime to justice. In other words, they have people who swim with the sharks, and they use them.
Mike Turner, Jim Jordan, John Ratcliffe and Devin Nunes have all been more effective in their cross.
Castor was brilliant.
Right. Think about this guy’s testimony. What did Trump tell you directly? “No linkage no quid pro quo! “ and what did you assume from that? “A quid pro quo “. How does that make sense?
Are the 5 minutes now going to get cut short because the witness has a flight to catch? Hmmm...
In spite of Castor debunking Sondland’s opening statement at the end, i.e., Trump wanted no quid pro quo, Chris Wallace is sticking to the opening statement. What an idiot.
Ukrainian Indictment Claims $7.4 Billion Obama-Linked Laundering, Puts Biden Group Take At $16.5 Million
An indictment drawn up by Ukraine’s Office of the Prosecutor General against Burisma owner Nikolai Zlochevsky claims that Hunter Biden and his partners received $16.5 million for their ‘services’ - according to Ukrainian MP Alexander Dubinsky of the ruling Servant of the People Party.
“The son of Vice-President Joe Biden was receiving payment for his services, with money raised through criminal means and money laundering,” he then said, adding “Biden received money that did not come from the company’s successful operation but rather from money stolen from citizens.”
Very interesting!
You get it. ☺
It was mention in this thread that Rush brought it up and wanted Starr’s comments put into context.
Not all FReepers are able to watch the inquiry live.
Obstructing congress?
What is he referring to?
I mean a veto could be considered obstructing congress!
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.