Posted on 11/20/2019 6:05:06 AM PST by maggief
Gordon Sondland, the U.S. ambassador to the European Union, will testify before the House Intelligence Committee on Wednesday, Nov. 20, as part of the impeachment probe into President Donald Trump.
(Excerpt) Read more at youtube.com ...
Napo is a sold out slave of his job in the media....and a shame and a disgrace to anything trustworthy.
oops
Did anyone get to see what happened after the MSM dropped coverage? What a little piece of Hitler Schiff he is when no one is looking.
“live” . but you can rewind
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=5c43uLHZPN8
Do tell
Yes, I saw Schitt in action as I was watching on C-Spam.
Talk about a widdle Hitler!
I’m on closed network feed that runs on after the MSM drops, they took up the letter and requests that Nunes entered into the process this morning. What a different piece of dirt Schiff really is when he knows the public is no longer watching. If the public would have seen him take up the matter and vote on it they would have a totally different view of this whole thing.
Two posts later here...
“All four of Gordon Sondland’s lawyers are Democrat Donors.” @TuckerCarlson Despite this, big win today for Republicans!— Donald J. Trump (@realDonaldTrump) November 21, 2019
Man, if the public really knew how unfair this litle SOB really was, this would be all over and done in Trump’s favor.
WHAT?
Do you suppose he forgot that C-Spam is still rolling?
Thank you.
Starr is dead to me but glad to know that he at least backpedaled his outrageous remarks!
Ok, thanks for that answer.
...is the most raw, obscene, criminal conspiracy I have ever seen in my lifetime; and again, during Watergate, I once sat in Sam Earvin's chair while it was still warm. My frame-of-reference is as good as it gets, despite the fact that less than half of the American population was even alive during Watergate.
No, Cspan and the way I watch it from Sat feeds he doesn’t care about because the viewership is much smaller. But if MSNBC and CNN had stayed on to see his Hitler crap it would have made a huge impact on his credibility as an “objective” chair in this.
OH? Well that is much better from Starr then.
The issue would be has the MSM misquoted Starr?
-PJ
That would be priceless.
Or - how can you sleep at night knowing your travesty of these “hearings” are going on.
Who cleared him, what does unofficially mean, and why should anyone believe him? Does he have a high level of success in his predictions?
Thanks, LG - so GLAD it is OVER for today.
Whew.
Gave me a headache and I wasn’t even watching it in person - just reading the comments here on FR - which were much more palatable than the actual hearing.
Appreciate the input from all.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.