Skip to comments.
Live Thread - Impeachment Hearings 11/19/2019
You Tube PBS ^
| 11-19-2019
| cww
Posted on 11/19/2019 6:46:57 AM PST by CWW
They need to go after this Lt. Colonel. Self important deep stater!
TOPICS: Breaking News; Front Page News; News/Current Events; Politics/Elections
KEYWORDS: 116th; hearing; impeachment; live; ltcpresident; trump; trumpukraine; ukraine; vindman
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 561-580, 581-600, 601-620 ... 781 next last
To: mewzilla
Somebody needs to tell Hannity that calling Adam Schiff a "congenital liar" is a non-starter, like "quid pro quo." I know it's now ingrained into his immutable patter, but he needs a better word.
"Congenital" means a birth defect, and Schiff could claim not guilty by reason of insanity if ever caught later, if his lying is "congenital."
Hannity needs to hire the Democrats to focus test congenital, unethical, purposeful, willful, knowingly, agenda-driven, power-hungry, and other phrases to explain Schiff's continual lying.
But it's not "congenital."
-PJ
581
posted on
11/19/2019 2:25:41 PM PST
by
Political Junkie Too
(Freedom of the press is the People's right to publish, not CNN's right to the 1st question.)
To: Reno89519
GOP seems to be running out the clock. Not going into any areas that might cause conflict. Steele Dossier???
582
posted on
11/19/2019 2:26:30 PM PST
by
lodi90
To: Political Junkie Too
I’m with you.
Pathological is a better choice.
583
posted on
11/19/2019 2:30:52 PM PST
by
mewzilla
(Break out the mustard seeds.)
To: Political Junkie Too
While Hannity is focus testing, can he bring up “sleepy” “creepy” “Biden 30330” (what does that mean anyway?). If his show was a word/drink game, I would die of alcohol poisoning.
584
posted on
11/19/2019 2:32:11 PM PST
by
smvoice
(I WILL NOT WEAR THE RIBBON.)
To: lodi90
Yeah... I’m disappointed. Jordan is trying, but these 2 witnesses are actually not helping. Were these the best ones for us to put on the stand?
585
posted on
11/19/2019 2:32:14 PM PST
by
VictoryGal
(Never give up, never surrender!)
To: mewzilla
This entire line of questioning is putting me to sleep. Zzzzzzzz
586
posted on
11/19/2019 2:32:32 PM PST
by
truthkeeper
(All Trump Has Going for Him is the Votes)
To: rollo tomasi
I missed Nunes, but this has now moved to the big boy’s adult room in level compared to what we have seen. These are the big boys who do not mix words or twist like the previous. :)
This raises the bar.
587
posted on
11/19/2019 2:35:18 PM PST
by
Openurmind
(The ultimate test of a moral society is the kind of world it leaves to its children. ~ D. Bonhoeffer)
To: Reno89519
I think they are making the sausage right now. Ugly, boring and mendacious. But necessary
I just wish they would throw some jalapenos into the mixture.
588
posted on
11/19/2019 2:35:54 PM PST
by
smvoice
(I WILL NOT WEAR THE RIBBON.)
To: smvoice
Morrison’s sweet grandma lawyer trying to protect dirtbag Vindman. Obvious partisanship.
589
posted on
11/19/2019 2:37:23 PM PST
by
lodi90
To: CWW
Why did Morrison's mother tell him not to answer questions?
590
posted on
11/19/2019 2:38:21 PM PST
by
Brown Deer
(America First!)
To: Brown Deer
“””””””Why did Morrison’s mother tell him not to answer questions?”””””””””
Granny just wanted him to get this over quick because Matlock is on soon.
To: lodi90
Interesting, eh?
Who is she?
592
posted on
11/19/2019 2:40:23 PM PST
by
maggief
To: mewzilla
Pathological is no better than congenital. It excuses the lying with a syndrome, and it's too big a word for the people in Rio Linda.
"Conniving liar" Schiff, or "Scheming liar" Schiff, would be better.
-PJ
593
posted on
11/19/2019 2:40:49 PM PST
by
Political Junkie Too
(Freedom of the press is the People's right to publish, not CNN's right to the 1st question.)
To: Brown Deer
‘Cause she’s a MOTHER obSTRUCTER
594
posted on
11/19/2019 2:41:14 PM PST
by
smvoice
(I WILL NOT WEAR THE RIBBON.)
To: VictoryGal
You have to remember, there is "nothing there".
How do you prove a negative where inductive reasoning is absent (And argue against the non-evidence)?
President oversees the execution of the law and has certain discretions, especially concerning foreign affairs, regarding aid to a historic corrupt entity. Quid pro quo has to be proven, and even then is not a impeachable offense if holding the aid to make sure the TAXPAYER'S monies are being spent in a responsible manner.
595
posted on
11/19/2019 2:41:15 PM PST
by
rollo tomasi
(Working hard to pay for deadbeats and corrupt politicians)
To: shelterguy
I saw Granny almost fall asleep twice. Having her Buzzy Ginsburg moment I guess.
596
posted on
11/19/2019 2:42:04 PM PST
by
lodi90
To: maggief
597
posted on
11/19/2019 2:42:15 PM PST
by
Raebie
Schiff does not look pleased after this last round.
598
posted on
11/19/2019 2:42:26 PM PST
by
Mariner
(War Criminal #18)
To: Openurmind
He just read his opening statement and stumbled over a lot of words, especially in the beginning. Towards the end he got down his grove. It’s been a long day for him and is probably pissed-off at the whole process so a BIG break should be given in the end.
599
posted on
11/19/2019 2:43:58 PM PST
by
rollo tomasi
(Working hard to pay for deadbeats and corrupt politicians)
To: Raebie
Yes, I know, thanks ... but was looking for her name.
600
posted on
11/19/2019 2:44:01 PM PST
by
maggief
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 561-580, 581-600, 601-620 ... 781 next last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson