Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: TigerClaws
Oh, the irony!

Stone was under investigation for talks with Wikileaks to see if they had the emails Hillary deleted while she was under investigation.

Yet Hillary hasn't been convicted for obstruction of justice. While Stone just got convicted for obstruction of justice trying to get to the bottom of Hillary's obstruction of justice.

I'm sure that makes perfect sense to the global-warming-causes-blizzards crowd.

44 posted on 11/15/2019 9:46:41 AM PST by Tell It Right (1st Thessalonians 5:21 -- Put everything to the test, hold fast to that which is true.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


To: Tell It Right

OK, so the crime was to inquire if WikiLeaks had the emails?

So if they did have the emails and Stone asked for the emails, and then got the emails from Wikileaks, would THAT be a crime?


60 posted on 11/15/2019 12:02:55 PM PST by Sam Gamgee
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 44 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson