The sentence excerpted shows how neutral, unbiased, and fair the article is. /s
Bottom line: which is it? Did the SD find mishandling of info/emails or not??
‘Some people did stuff. There was no intent.’
Putting a secret email server in your house , NOT in a SCIF, to handle sensitive State Department communications shows absolute deliberate INTENT.
The act of creating and using a private server for classified government emails is by definition deliberate mishandling of classified information.
Deleting classified emails created while in government service is by definition deliberate mishandling of classified information.
Investigators finding your classified emails on another persons unsecured personal computer is by definition deliberate mishandling of classified information.
Video is called Hillary Clinton-no intent.
Of course not.
Hillary’s barbed tentacles are all over the place.
The fact that it happened more than once or twice shows that it was deliberate mishandling.
Exactly the outcome we all expected. Hillary Clinton put her official email account on a private server but it was not intentional. A lot of people sent her classified information and they would all be guilty as well but it wasnt intentional. Probably many of the people who could not find intent had some involvement of their own but it was not intentional. Therefore no crimes were committed and we can get back to work for American People.
I have seen people walked off base for far less. Literally guys with firearms and handcuffs show up. A woman who shall remain nameless but not blameless made the mistake of lying the the Sheriff's department about the whereabouts of a former boyfriend. For that, MPs came to her desk "Stand up, do not touch the computer again! You may pick up your purse. Come with us." and that was the last anyone ever saw of her.
This is BS. Pure BS. Hillary and her cohorts in crime implement an obvious pay-for-play scheme using the State Department and the Clinton Foundation, leak hundreds of classified emails - INTENTIONALLY, and nothing happens? Eff that, they should all be behind bars for life, or stood up against a wall.
No “DELIBERATE” mishandling? Putting the comms and information on a PRIVATE server and then on SERVERS plural located in the Ukraine!
That is QUITE “deliberate”... decisively so— by a criminal— hitlery clinton and her “advisors” who then became her “lawyers” and thus immune from the FBI.
Servers located in Ukraine- to begin with— that handled the DNC information and emails... were put there by the #1 funder of the demorats-— the clinton foundation and hitlery’s campaign. So, when a “hack” is “claimed” and blamed on “the Russians”.... the FBI cannot access them— as they are not in the United States. So the DNC “hires” Crowstrike— a UKRAINIAN company— to “look at” the servers that THEY THEMSELVES WERE RUNNING!
Seth Rich— thumbdrives— to English intermediary— to Wikileaks.
And Seth Rich is MURDERED under hitlery’s orders. Let’s not forget the “FEAR” that Donna Brazile admitted to— curtains closed to avoid snipers... etc. Wonder why. It is hitlery— the murderous biotch from Satan’s Hell.
No deliberate mishandling of classified information
So why did she delete 30.000 emails
Destroy so mush equipment like cell phones
Kept server hid
Oh wait it’s CNN news
Today we have two legal doctrines. one for democrats and one for Republicans. Folks we are now a Banana Republic, thank you Hillary Clinton.
Title 18, section 798
(a)Whoever knowingly and willfully communicates, furnishes, transmits, or otherwise makes available to an unauthorized person, or publishes, or uses in any manner prejudicial to the safety or interest of the United States or for the benefit of any foreign government to the detriment of the United States any classified information
(1)concerning the nature, preparation, or use of any code, cipher, or cryptographic system of the United States or any foreign government; or
(2)concerning the design, construction, use, maintenance, or repair of any device, apparatus, or appliance used or prepared or planned for use by the United States or any foreign government for cryptographic or communication intelligence purposes; or
(3)concerning the communication intelligence activities of the United States or any foreign government; or
(4)obtained by the processes of communication intelligence from the communications of any foreign government, knowing the same to have been obtained by such processes
Shall be fined under this title or imprisoned not more than ten years, or both.
...because hosting your own email server to control access isn’t deliberate at all!
/s
This aint horse shoes or hand grenades, this is Nat Sec!
Looks like the State Dept, wants adjoining cells!
Lol, and folks here think brennen McCanbe stroke will be brought down. Yeah go ahead lash at me but what I’m seeing so far for the last 3 years is criminals walking smiling and making money selling books. You see something different if so I’d like to hear about it.
Just to prepare you for the upcoming Horowitz report...
I rest my case on the State Department.
IMO < it's as or more corrupt than Hillary Clinton.
Since when was intent added to national security secret laws? I seem to remember a certain submariner who got thrown in jail with “no intent” to harm national security.
Of course he was not a high ranking democrat.