Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Karl Spooner
He says "officers are hurting" because of the fatal shooting and that he has not encountered an officer who disagrees with the decision to arrest Aaron Dean."

Are they thinking he needs to be arrested to ease their troubles of having to deal with the angry neighborhoods, or because he actually did something wrong?

Also I wouldn't necessarily believe the Chief has his actual finger on the pulse of the rank and file.

He shouldn't have gone into that woman's back yard without announcing himself, and that is his first mistake. He also should have just dodged out of the window view when he saw she had a gun, and if he fired intentionally, that was his second mistake.

I read comments yesterday that suggested he didn't actually intend to fire, but because he had a Glock, he may have fired it accidentally. It apparently doesn't have a safety, and will fire with the slightest touch on the trigger. The commenter claimed that he was still talking when the gun went off, so I shouldn't be surprised if he offers that as a defense.

102 posted on 10/15/2019 3:23:50 PM PDT by DiogenesLamp ("of parents owing allegiance to no oither sovereignty.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 51 | View Replies ]


To: DiogenesLamp
but because he had a Glock, he may have fired it accidentally. It apparently doesn't have a safety, and will fire with the slightest touch on the trigger.

1) I own and regularly shoot a Glock 19. Fire with the slightest touch? That's 100% pure BS.

2) Rule 2: Never let your muzzle cover something you're not willing to destroy.

3) Rule 3: Keep your finger off the trigger until your sights are on the target.

4) Rule 4: Identify your target, and what is beyond it.

This murderous idiot violated at least two, probably three very basic rules of safe firearms handling, and displayed depraved indifference to human life. Lock him up.

106 posted on 10/15/2019 3:36:48 PM PDT by NorthMountain (... the right of the peopIe to keep and bear arms shall not be infringed)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 102 | View Replies ]

To: DiogenesLamp

Unless they can prove the firearm is defective, the mere fact that the gun was fired is criminal intent in Texas. There is no “What was going through his mind”? type of defense allowed in Texas courts. There was a Texas ex-cop explaining Texas law about that on last nights thread.


125 posted on 10/15/2019 4:26:30 PM PDT by Karl Spooner
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 102 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson