Schiff: 'There doesn't need to be a quid pro quo'

The Washington Examiner ^ | October 13, 2019 11:46 AM | Mike Brest

[jeffc]

The Dems just figured out the quid pro quo thing wasn’t working for them. Time to move the goal posts (again)!

[Attention Surplus Disorder]

Every time Schiff opens his mouth, he should be asked “is this another parody?”

[Gay State Conservative]

Or,to put it another way,there doesn't need to be a high crime *or* a misdemeanor.

[Yaelle]

Geez. This whole thing is a joke.

[Yaelle]

You know Trump will!

[mass55th]

"I think either way the democrats know they were going to lose."

Any normal group of people would at least try to look competent despite knowing they're losing. Even real lemmings would handle themselves better.

[nathanbedford]

Anticipating both of the arguments articulated by shift, for some time now I have been posting to the effect that Republicans should not start arguing from a fallback position, that is, they should argue from the get go that there is no "high crime" even if there was a quid pro quo for the reasons expressed in this reply .

[CodeToad]

If Biden wins the election (hahahehehehahhahahahohoha), Shift For Brains is setting Biden up for impeachment.

[lastchance]

Schiff is full of what comes out of a cow’s rear end. There is no impeachable offense at all. Even a quid pro quo does not rise to that level. Making up offenses out of whole cloth is not going to change that.

[Lisbon1940]

And if there is, big deal.

[Fido969]

And, I’m sure he was aggressively challenged on that.

[romanesq]

“When are they going to start talking about Schiff’s 16 visits to the Meth Guy Buck in LA?”

Right after they get to the Biden Crime Family corruption in Ukraine, China and elsewhere.

[timestax]

[Singermom]

https://voterportal.sos.la.gov/graphical Even after a Trump visit the dem got 47% of the vote. Too close for me.

[Pete Dovgan]

We don’t need no stinking crime. Shoe me the man, I will show you the crime Schifthead is at it agin. To be clear, it is the DUTY of the President of the United States to investigate corruption, especially high crimes, of the last POTUS and VPOTUS. Not investigating criminal sellouts to a foreign power is WORSE than a pardon, because every Democrat will continue to believe that they are the ‘good guys’ and mean ole Trump was just trying to get an unfair advantage.......that they would have never done....sarcasm.

Trump, if your people read this, get Barr off his bagpipes and get after these crooks.. The people know what’s up now.

[Pete Dovgan]

We don’t need no stinking crime. Shoe me the man, I will show you the crime Schifthead is at it agin. To be clear, it is the DUTY of the President of the United States to investigate corruption, especially high crimes, of the last POTUS and VPOTUS. Not investigating criminal sellouts to a foreign power is WORSE than a pardon, because every Democrat will continue to believe that they are the ‘good guys’ and mean ole Trump was just trying to get an unfair advantage.......that they would have never done....sarcasm.

Trump, if your people read this, get Barr off his bagpipes and get after these crooks.. The people know what’s up now.

[Bullish]

I’m sure Obama got his cut of the Biden’s windfall too.

[Sir Napsalot]

Well then, let Congress vote on this then. Put it on record.

[hal ogen]

Just what kind of mental defective voted for this congenital liar and overall misfit?

[hal ogen]

...and to self-exile for the good of this Country.