Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Yo-Yo

Personally I think the judges logic is right on the money.

The ATF has been bastardizing the definitions for decades in favor of more control.


6 posted on 10/12/2019 11:18:41 AM PDT by riverrunner ( o the public,)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


To: riverrunner

I took it another way. Strange how we can all look at the same thing, and interpret what we see so differently. You are right in that “The ATF has been bastardizing the definitions for decades in favor of more control”, but I saw it as another good reason for less government in that overall this decision protects BIG government, and doesn’t help protect the citizenry one iota as the judge literally swapped our safety to protect BIG government gun control.


8 posted on 10/12/2019 11:44:40 AM PDT by rockinqsranch ("Democratic" party sold out to the ICP. It is now the Communist Party USA.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies ]

To: riverrunner
Personally I think the judges logic is right on the money.

The ATF has been bastardizing the definitions for decades in favor of more control.

As I said before, under strict interpretation of the statute then even the 1911 has no legally-defined frame or receiver.

I highly doubt that strict of an interpretation of the law would hold up on appeal.

16 posted on 10/12/2019 1:02:37 PM PDT by Yo-Yo ( is the /sarc tag really necessary?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson