Why not? It is basic freedom of association.
No one should be forced to associate with someone they do not wish to associate with.
No private employer should be forced to hire someone they do not wish to hire.
Her question shows why she certainly does not have the intellect to be on the bench. As far as I can tell from the article that was not an issue at all. The issue was whether a person can be protected from employer discipline by claiming discrimination. A heterosexual would also be fired if he groped a woman during a tandem sky dive.
Why not? It is basic freedom of association.
No one should be forced to associate with someone they do not wish to associate with.
No private employer should be forced to hire someone they do not wish to hire.””’
There were many reasons why, when I became self-employed in 1980, I refused to hire ANY other persons to increase the number of bookkeeping clients I could deal with. I worked alone, and put in many a long day by myself.
In 1980, all this LBGTQ data certainly was not evident against employers.
I still have ONE client-—have had him for 50 years. I certainly value his loyalty.
I cannot even begin to understand how ANY employer today is expected to deal with ANY possible new employee.
Why not? It is basic freedom of association.
No one should be forced to associate with someone they do not wish to associate with.
No private employer should be forced to hire someone they do not wish to hire.””’
There were many reasons why, when I became self-employed in 1980, I refused to hire ANY other persons to increase the number of bookkeeping clients I could deal with. I worked alone, and put in many a long day by myself.
In 1980, all this LBGTQ data certainly was not evident against employers.
I still have ONE client-—have had him for 50 years. I certainly value his loyalty.
I cannot even begin to understand how ANY employer today is expected to deal with ANY possible new employee.