Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

So Romney denies he told Nancy anything

Who to believe, Rush or Romney? I’m not a huge Rush fan (too much cheerleading for the GOP establishment) but I can’t stand, and don’t trust, stab-backer Romney

I’ll choose to believe Rush

1 posted on 09/28/2019 10:36:40 AM PDT by rintintin
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies ]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-38 last
To: rintintin

Rush is careful with reporting facts. On the very rare occasion that he gets something wrong, he issues a prominent correction.

Rush is a square.


27 posted on 09/28/2019 11:04:45 AM PDT by UnwashedPeasant (Trump is solving the worldÂ’s problems only to distract us from Russia.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: rintintin

That’s NOT what Rush said. He said that Romney ‘assured’ Pelosi that there is enough Republican support to ‘remove’ Trump. Rush also commented that he didn’t think Romney meant that there was enough to ‘convict’ Trump. It was just the opposite of what this writer is alleging.


29 posted on 09/28/2019 11:06:30 AM PDT by LibertyWoman
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: rintintin

Mitt could clear it up by going on CNN and MSNBC and saying he won’t vote to impeach Trump. Something tells me he won’t be doing that.


31 posted on 09/28/2019 11:08:10 AM PDT by wiseprince
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: rintintin

Given the choice between Rush and a slimy lib paper?
Especially a paper from the city and state that elected that slimy two-faced backstabbing RINO?

Give me a break!


32 posted on 09/28/2019 11:08:12 AM PDT by Da Coyote (eh)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: rintintin

Read the headline and then read the story. The headline says Rush said the senate would convict but the body of the story states that Rush said there were not enough to convict. Given what is in print we know the paper is lying. GIven that they did not link the available audio it means their likely lying.


33 posted on 09/28/2019 11:08:54 AM PDT by Splorndle
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: rintintin
Jeff Flake said there are 30 Senators who would convict if the vote were secret.

Romney said he was concerned by the phone transcript.

It's possible that both stories were discussed on the same show, and this is agitprop to conflate the two.

That said, I wouldn't mind it if Limbaugh took a page from the leftist playbook and threw out a few "unproven" claims against some of our own, just to make them respond.

Remember, the rules now are to say anything loudly and frequently, and then issue a correction quietly later. So have at it -- say that Romney told Pelosi he's with her. Say that Nadler knowingly lied. Say that Schiff knowingly lied. Say that Durbin colluded with Ukrainians to entrap Trump.

Say it, say it loudly, say it frequently, and make them come out and address it.

If they complain, then ask why should a Congressman or a Senator be held to a higher bar than the President?

-PJ

35 posted on 09/28/2019 11:24:45 AM PDT by Political Junkie Too (The 1st Amendment gives the People the right to a free press, not CNN the right to the 1st question.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: rintintin

That is their obvious last ditch play. Everything is headed to a US Seante betrayal of the Americam Founders and the American people. They will try to take control of the military from Trump with these false charges and false conviction. That is why the US Senate Rinos said nothing when they should have been scolding Nancy with an ultimatum.

You can step back and see the entire project. The pee Dossier used to create fales Russian charges. These combined with vote fraud loses all of California and the US House. The the Intel communities secretly change laws and charge the President via whistleswapping. The only way they can stop Trump ‘legally’ is a Senate betrayal on impeachment.


36 posted on 09/28/2019 11:25:53 AM PDT by justa-hairyape (The user name is sarcastic. Although at times it may not appear that way.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: rintintin

Exacty. If I have to choose between a Newspaper and the RINO Carpetbagger Romney and Rush. The matter takes a mere fraction of a second. I choose to believe Rush.

I am sure Rush will address this issue on Monday.


40 posted on 09/28/2019 11:36:50 AM PDT by ocrp1982 (Lurking since the late 90's. Recently retired. No tagline yet.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: rintintin

If Romey denies it is true. If he had admitted to it, I would be doubtful. But if he denies it, that seals it. He did.


41 posted on 09/28/2019 11:45:25 AM PDT by sport
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: rintintin

MITT IS A LOSER.


43 posted on 09/28/2019 11:56:15 AM PDT by chopperk (ms)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: rintintin
Rush Limbaugh falsely claimed to his massive audience this week that Sen. Mitt Romney, R-Utah, told House Speaker Nancy Pelosi that enough Senate Republicans would break ranks to remove President Donald Trump from office.

He didn't say this during the part of his show I listened to when he suggested Romney was getting cozy with Pelosi. He recited a litany of all the things Pelosi and her ilk did to Romney. He then wondered why Romney decided to come out as a RINO.

46 posted on 09/28/2019 12:18:50 PM PDT by stevem
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: rintintin

How does the Mormon Tribune know it’s “not true”? Because the Dog Torturer said so?


47 posted on 09/28/2019 12:20:46 PM PDT by montag813
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: rintintin; Jim Robinson; Grampa Dave
I heard Bill O'Reilly say this week that Romney was a big problem. He said the GOP MUST unite behind POTUS, to help voice the public case against the Rats' fabrications, lies and overreach.

This was on Glenn Beck's show. O'Reilly said, and I quote: "Mitt needs to shut the F up, and get behind Trump." The fact that O'Reilly actually used the letter "F" shocked Beck, and Glenn piped up with - "Bill! I've never heard you use the F letter!...," while Bill continued to lambaste Romney.

O'Reilly being this big classy Catholic guy really shocked Beck. It WAS rather odd, to hear him say that Either he is extremely angry with Mitt, or is getting a bit doddering, mentally. Anyway - he is extremely upset with Romney's turn-coat conduct - and said if the GOP does not unite behind Trump and HELP him, Trump can't do this alone against a hostile Media, the Rats, AND the Deep State. HE NEEDS THE GOP's HELP.

48 posted on 09/28/2019 12:25:13 PM PDT by 4Liberty (The taxpayers can always take one more for the team. - The Government)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: rintintin

Is it wrong of me to hope an asteroid, aw never mind.


50 posted on 09/28/2019 12:51:16 PM PDT by VTenigma (The Democrat party is the party of the mathematically challenged)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: rintintin

When Rush says “Now it’s time for an OBSCENE PROFIT break”, I love it, because libs hate it.


52 posted on 09/28/2019 12:55:46 PM PDT by Mark (Celebrities... is there anything they do not know? -Homer Simpson)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: rintintin

Rush’s truth telling credentials are solid besides; you all know deep inside Romney is one of THEM.


54 posted on 09/28/2019 1:06:25 PM PDT by exPBRrat (.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: rintintin

If Rush said that, he was caught between Romney’s call for hearings on impeachment and Jeff Flake’s claim that up to 30 GOP senators would vote to impeach Trump if the vote was secret.


57 posted on 09/28/2019 2:06:19 PM PDT by Gumdrop (qui)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: rintintin

You can’t trust your feelings about what a person says or what someone says another said (hearsay). You have to go on the facts. What they have said in the pasts, what others in agreement about what another has said.

The scriptures say that every fact must be confirmed by two or more witnesses. And we have more witnesses than ever before - books, the internet (where reliable). Why just rely on one witness? It is not Scriptural.

As for prophets, don’t trust your feelings about them for “the Heart is deceitful above all things”. Use the Prophet’s test if anything they say the Lord will do and it does not come to pass-he or she is not a Prophet of God - even one time. Test what they say against Scripture not your feelings.

This includes miracles. Remember Moses cast down his staff and it became a serpent. Pharaoh called his magicians AND THEY DID THEY SAME. But Moses’s staff that became a serpent and swallowed up all the others. Do not believe a person because of miracle(s) and especially if it leads you away from faith in God and His Word.

On Mitt Romney. He gave in to the Wicked Massachusetts supreme court which told him he had to approve homosexuality. His approval, Joe Biden’s and Obama’s that we have it across the Land today.

Can you trust anything he says after that? Can you trust Biden either?

Don’t trust someone because of your feelings. Go based on the facts and what the Scriptures says is true.


59 posted on 09/28/2019 2:18:46 PM PDT by CptnObvious (Question her now.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-38 last

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson