Posted on 09/27/2019 8:50:04 PM PDT by bitt
THE HITS KEEP COMING Whistleblower Report Continues to FALL APART!
On Thursday the alleged whistleblower complaint against President Trump was declassified and released to the public.
** On Thursday Rep. Mark Meadows revealed the partisan CIA whistleblower was wrong when he wrote in his report that State Department official Ulrich Brechbuhl was on the call with the Ukrainian president. He wasnt.
** The partisan CIA whistleblower was also in error when he insisted in his report the phone call transcript between Trump and Zelensky did not contain anything remotely sensitive. It did.
And now this The partisan CIA whistleblower claimed President Trump threatened the Ukrainian president to play ball or he would withhold US assistance to his country.
On Friday night we learned this was another lie. The Ukrainian government did not know the US had suspended aid to the country until ONE MONTH after the call.
(VIDEO)
(Excerpt) Read more at thegatewaypundit.com ...
P
Would love for this to be true but what is their source or evidence for this.
The NY Times.
the NYtimes LOL
Fox News Video at article provides the info, which they said is being reported by the New York Times.
I have gotten to the point where I will no longer click on Gateway Pundit posts.
It is all “BREAKING!!” and “BOOM!!” and “BOMBSHELL!!”.
The actual post never measures up to the headline. It’s basically spam and a waste of time.
DEMOCRATS LIED! Ukraine Had NO IDEA US Had Suspended Funding
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=_aJWGsrLigw
Am I missing something here? An extortioner would, of course, always wait until after making a threat before making good on that threat, right? It wouldn't work to threaten suspending aid to a country if that country knew that aid had already been suspended, right?
Wouldn't the threat have to be phrased thusly: "You'd better launch an investigation against Biden, or we will suspend aid!" Such a threat would work only if the threatened party believed that acceding to the blackmailer's demands would ward off the penalty, right?
So how does this statement (that the Ukrainian government did not know that the foreign aid had been suspended until one month AFTER the telephone call) exonerate Trump?
Help me here!
Regards,
Is it time to 308peach the shoitbirds in CONgreff?
[[It is all BREAKING!! and BOOM!! and BOMBSHELL!!.]]
And pretty soon “This one weird trick will change your life forever”
We cannot work with liars. We cannot have a government run by liars.
badly written article-
Doesn’t matter whether trump suspended aid later or before- and they didn’t know- the whistleblower claimed Trump told them “Either investigate biden or no aid”- and that is NOT what the written conversation reveals at all- Trump said no such thing- the left are lying pure and simple
So Gatewaypundit has to explain when the aid was suspended, and why, then tie that in with the conversation Trump had somehow- there is no connection between between the suspension of aid and the phone call
Don’t know if I’m reading it wrong- but Trump is exonerated by the sheer fact that he did NOT do a quid pro quo in the phone conversation or at any other point
“So how does this statement (that the Ukrainian government did not know that the foreign aid had been suspended until one month AFTER the telephone call) exonerate Trump?”
Yeah. I had not heard that we suspended aid. Probably completely unrelated to whatever they were discussing ... however the dems will twist this into their narrative.
When cnn, msnbc and fox report this we can relax more.
Rush was saying this this morning. Its all BS.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.