Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Moonman62
At that point they were in an overspeed condition. If they had been competent pilots they would have pulled back on the throttles and MCAS would have been deactivated automatically. They didn’t need to know that MCAS existed.

True, but they also had the stall warning blaring. I believe that most pilots would consider a stall to be a more immediate concern than over speed and the corrective actions are basically the exact opposite of an over speed.

43 posted on 09/22/2019 7:59:33 AM PDT by Fraxinus (My opinion, worth what you paid.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 39 | View Replies ]


To: Fraxinus
I believe that most pilots would consider a stall to be a more immediate concern than over speed and the corrective actions are basically the exact opposite of an over speed.

It is almost impossible for a stall and an over speed to occur simultaneously. In order for this to occur, the plane would have to pull more than 9 Gs.

Competent pilots would recognize they had an AOA malfunction.

44 posted on 09/22/2019 8:16:21 AM PDT by FtrPilot
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 43 | View Replies ]

To: Fraxinus

True, but they also had the stall warning blaring. I believe that most pilots would consider a stall to be a more immediate concern than over speed and the corrective actions are basically the exact opposite of an over speed.

...

The stick shaker was activated which was a stall warning.

But the pilots retracted the flaps, which shouldn’t be done when there is a stall warning.

Had they left the flaps where they were then MCAS would not have been activated.


45 posted on 09/22/2019 8:31:52 AM PDT by Moonman62 (Charity comes from wealth.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 43 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson