Skip to comments.
Dems launch longshot bid for DC statehood at rare hearing, as Republicans hammer local corruption
Fox News ^
| September 19, 2019
| Alex Pappas
Posted on 09/19/2019 9:15:17 AM PDT by jazusamo
click here to read article
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-33 next last
1
posted on
09/19/2019 9:15:17 AM PDT
by
jazusamo
To: jazusamo
I hope there is enough opposition so they don’t have a chance.
To: jazusamo
DC Statehood is perennial loser. It should fail again. DC has a very corrrupt political class. Its government is corrupt.
3
posted on
09/19/2019 9:19:21 AM PDT
by
Rapscallion
(If they are not for Trump, they are against him. Fire them.)
To: jazusamo
Return the rest of D.C. to Virginia. Maryland has its bit.
Then move the seat of government to Alaska above the Arctic circle.
4
posted on
09/19/2019 9:20:08 AM PDT
by
Rurudyne
(Standup Philosopher)
To: jazusamo
DOA in the Senate. Like Republicans would happily give the Democrats two new US Senate seats in perpetuity? Dream on.
5
posted on
09/19/2019 9:20:34 AM PDT
by
goldstategop
(In Memory Of A Dearly Beloved Friend Who Lives In My Heart Forever)
To: Innovative
Me too. I think it’s unlikely now that it has a chance but the Rats will keep trying should they ever control the three branches again.
6
posted on
09/19/2019 9:21:41 AM PDT
by
jazusamo
(Have You Donated to Keep Free Republic Up and Running?)
To: jazusamo
"no new States shall be formed or erected within the Jurisdiction of any other State; nor any State be formed by the Junction of two or more States, or parts of States, without the Consent of the Legislatures of the States concerned as well as of the Congress.
It seems to me that since Congress is the government of DC, that an organic act creating this "state" would arise from Congress petitioning itself.
Allowing this would be as unwise as allowing Congress to award itself 3 electoral votes in 1960.
7
posted on
09/19/2019 9:27:37 AM PDT
by
Jim Noble
(There is nothing racist in stating plainly what most people already know)
I wonder if their enthusiasm would change if walk away really took off
8
posted on
09/19/2019 9:36:26 AM PDT
by
dsrtsage
(Complexity is merely simplicity lacking imagination)
To: jazusamo
Not this S%^$ again!
Rust never sleeps.
9
posted on
09/19/2019 9:40:23 AM PDT
by
flamberge
(The wheels keep turning)
To: jazusamo
The District of Columbia only makes a decent sized COUNTY, and is far from being a reasonably sized state.
Now, if some enterprising politician wants to widen the circle a little bit, and take the surrounding collar counties in Maryland, Virginia and West Virginia, then include THAT area, they might have the nucleus of a decent sized state. But DC alone?
Unh-unh.
Most pf the rest of Virginia would be HAPPY to be rid of that part of the state that borders on the Potomac, and return to their cherished ways of patrician independence from the DC monstrosity,
10
posted on
09/19/2019 9:41:15 AM PDT
by
alloysteel
(Nowhere in the Universe is there escape from the consequences of the crime of stupidity.)
To: jazusamo
No to DC statehood, No to Puerto Rican statehood.
11
posted on
09/19/2019 9:41:22 AM PDT
by
Lurkinanloomin
(Natural Born Citizen Means Born Here Of Citizen Parents_Know Islam, No Peace-No Islam, Know Peace)
To: Lurkinanloomin
12
posted on
09/19/2019 9:43:37 AM PDT
by
jazusamo
(Have You Donated to Keep Free Republic Up and Running?)
To: jazusamo
13
posted on
09/19/2019 9:45:32 AM PDT
by
FLT-bird
To: jazusamo
Would statehood have to be approved in the same way a Constitutional Amendment is approved? I suppose I could look it up but I'm lazy.If the process is the same I absolutely can't see 38 states saying “yes”.
To: Lurkinanloomin
The only reason I don't support Puerto Rican independence is because China would offer them a few billion dollars and pick it up as a naval base.Kinda like what they're doing now in Africa.
To: Gay State Conservative
The article states it would more than likely require a Constitutional Amendment.
16
posted on
09/19/2019 10:02:12 AM PDT
by
jazusamo
(Have You Donated to Keep Free Republic Up and Running?)
To: Rapscallion
You are correct on all accounts.
To: Rurudyne
Virginia already got their part back. It is now Arlington. Rest of it belongs to Maryland except for federal buildings.
To: jazusamo
I think a much better idea would be for the federal government to use eminent domain of the entire district. Then they could bulldoze the slums, totally rebuild the decrepit infrastructure, and build a commercial district that would be only leased to businesses.
Other than VIP and embassy vehicles, most traffic would be by public transport. A back route for delivery trucks would be out of the way.
Its land area is only 61 square miles.
19
posted on
09/19/2019 10:12:34 AM PDT
by
yefragetuwrabrumuy
(Liberalism is the belief everyone else should be in treatment for your disorder.)
To: jazusamo
Everything besides Federal property needs to just be split up between Maryland and Virginia. It’s tough to split up a sh*thole but they own it.
20
posted on
09/19/2019 10:14:10 AM PDT
by
shanover
(...To disarm the people is the best and most effectual way to enslave them.-S.Adams)
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-33 next last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson