The New York Times Has Abandoned Liberalism for Activism

NYMag ^ | Andrew Sullivan

[OddLane]

At least Abe Rosenthal kept them sane-for a while, at least.

[Right Wing Assault]

Nothing has changed.

Yes. Leftism and activism, same words for lying.

[MarkL]

This from the "Paper of Record" that actively lied to hide the slaughter of millions of Ukrainians by Stalin in the 1930s, and to this day, brags of the Pulitzer Prize won by Walter Duraty and his lies. The "Paper of Record" that helped hide the Holocaust from the West. The "Paper of Record" that helped hide the murderous reign on Stalin until his death. And just recently, "The Paper of Record" waxed rhapsodic about what a wonderful guy Mao was, until they had to take the tweet down when it was pointed out that they were celebrating the life of what was most likely the single worst mass murderer in human history.

Mark

[SuperLuminal]

"he New York Times Has Abandoned Liberalism for Activism

Not sure how old the author is, but he apparently is clueless about NYSlimes history...

I'm old enough to remember when the Slimes couldn't resist getting a woody over both Hitler and Stalin... For an organization driven by Marxism, the Slimes did not care which flavor of Marxism that Hitler & Stalin espoused...

The only possible change the Slimes can take at this present juncture is to foster a 2nd communist revolution here in the U.S... It now appears that "activism" is now a synonym for "revolution"...

While the first communist revolution may have been saved, when on it's deathbed after just a short existence, there is no Felix Dzerzhinsky here in the U.S. who could save it from 80-million fully armed Americans...

The 2nd Amendment, in some part, prevented the Japs from following up their victory at Pearl Harbor with the next logical move... The 2nd Amendment will defeat the coming bloody 2nd communist revolution when it occurs here in the U.S.

Tick...Tock...

[elbook]

They abandoned journalism long ago ...