To: NELSON111
recon has verified it with SFMR data. SFMR is still being developed. It's in the prototype stage now and is not used for verifying anything. Estimations, yes, verification no. Calibration techniques using SFMR are still being developed using ground station data. And yes, I'm a professional microwave Engineer.
77 posted on
09/01/2019 2:08:20 PM PDT by
Thermalseeker
(If ignorance is bliss how come there aren't more happy people?)
To: Thermalseeker
NHC uses SFMR all the time. Im on the conference calls with them all the time. They use it in combo with dropsounde data and flight level winds. All of which point to gusts to 220. Read the NHC discussions.
82 posted on
09/01/2019 2:46:27 PM PDT by
NELSON111
(Congress: The Ralph Wolf and Sam Sheepdog show. Theater for sheep. My politics determines my "hero")
To: Thermalseeker
This is from the 11 am discussion: The NOAA plane reported a peak flight-level wind of 159 kt, while the SFMR from both planes have measured winds between 155 and 170 kt. A dropsonde from the NOAA plane measured a wind gust of 176 kt at the surface. A blend of these measurements yield to an initial intensity of 155 kt
They have enough confidence in it from what they see, coupled with other obs, to use it if they are unflagged. They do it ALL THE TIME.
83 posted on
09/01/2019 2:51:26 PM PDT by
NELSON111
(Congress: The Ralph Wolf and Sam Sheepdog show. Theater for sheep. My politics determines my "hero")
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson