They don't make liberals smarter than Chris Hayes.
No, really, I'm not kidding. They don't.
![](https://i.kym-cdn.com/entries/icons/original/000/004/128/BRILLIANT_.jpg)
1 posted on
08/31/2019 1:45:42 PM PDT by
Lazamataz
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20, 21-40, 41-51 last
To: Lazamataz
77 posted on
08/31/2019 5:24:44 PM PDT by
Nifster
(I see puppy dogs in the clouds)
To: Lazamataz
would be unconstitutional if it wasn'tspecifically in the Constitution. This passes for genius in liberal circles!!!!!
79 posted on
08/31/2019 5:32:52 PM PDT by
ontap
To: Lazamataz
I thought it was not cool to make fun of Retards....but....this guy IS a Retard.
The problem is that these people really have nothing to talk about because they really cant just go saying out loud that, We are the moral superior overseers of the masses, you must submit!!!!!!
At least not yet anyway.
The job of the useful idiot.
81 posted on
08/31/2019 5:46:35 PM PDT by
right way right
(May we remain sober over mere men, for God really is our only true hope.)
To: Lazamataz
What would a Liberal do if they had any brains?
They take them and play with them.
82 posted on
08/31/2019 5:46:43 PM PDT by
crz
To: Lazamataz
What Chris meant to say...
The US Constitution was conceived by evil pasty white men in white powdered wigs.
It is a document of oppression by the white Europeans to dominate over brown people and needs to be abolished.
85 posted on
08/31/2019 6:40:07 PM PDT by
TADSLOS
(You know why you can enjoy a day at the Zoo? Because walls work.)
To: Lazamataz
Liberals have not been taught that the Constitution was designed purposely to make it extremely difficult to pass legislation. Only the most critical laws that could muster a majority of the House, a majority of the Senate, and the consent of the President could become the law of the land. Some specific areas even required super-majorities, which would make action even more difficult. One example is the super-majority needed to remove a sitting President.
The reason for this built-in resistance to passing legislation was to protect THE PEOPLE from creating an over-bearing government, such as that against which the Founders had just fought a revolution.
This vital purpose of the Constitution has been thwarted by unethical horse-trading and a Supreme Court which has been intimidated into approving crap like Obamacare, Social Security, and all the other myriad of over-reaching government agencies. Most of the states mirror this loss of limitation on government reach.
We live in interesting times.
To: Lazamataz
If we had eggs we could have bacon and eggs if we had bacon...
90 posted on
08/31/2019 8:46:31 PM PDT by
GOPJ
("Poised to" "prepared to" "considering" "Intends" (Freeper LS) isn't "news it's crystal ball gazing.)
To: Lazamataz; AuH2ORepublican; fieldmarshaldj; NFHale; GOPsterinMA; BillyBoy; campaignPete R-CT; LS; ..
93 posted on
09/01/2019 12:56:10 AM PDT by
Impy
(I have no virtue to signal.)
To: Lazamataz
To: Lazamataz
Murder would be acceptable and legal and constitutional
if there weren't laws against it.
So would bank robbery and rape and all of those
other really fun crimes.
To: Lazamataz
the Supreme Court having developed a jurisprudence of one person, one vote, which means each individual vote has to carry roughly the same amount of weight as each other individual vote.Except individuals voting is not part of the Constitutional system for choosing a President. At all.
To the extent permitted by each of the fifty State Legislatures, individuals vote in a statewide advisory election to direct the Legislature (where permitted) to appoint certain individuals as Electors.
106 posted on
09/06/2019 4:50:56 AM PDT by
Jim Noble
(There is nothing racist in stating plainly what most people already know)
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20, 21-40, 41-51 last
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson