Elections have consequences for the Supreme Court ---If a seat opens up, Trump must fill it---

The Boston Herald ^ | 08-27-2019 | Herald Staff

[TMN78247]

EVERY GOP Senator must we WARNED that “cooperating with” the LEFTIST DIMocRATS on “vetting” any SCOTUS nominee by President Trump will be LETHAL for their fund-raising & re-election chances.

Personally, I’m sick to death of RINOs & DIMocRATS = I want them ALL G-O-N-E, GONE from every position of public trust.

Yours, TMN78247

[familyop]

"I’m hoping we get Amy."

I did a quick search some time back, and some reservations arose.

Barrett adopted two children from Haiti. How might that affect her thoughts in regards to immigration issues? Where do Catholic charities stand on immigration and borders?

Also,...

Catholic Judges in Capital Cases [Information in re. Amy Coney Barrett]
Marquette Law Review, Notre Dame Law School ^ | 1998 | Amy Coney Barrett, John H. Garvey
Posted on 07/03/2018 2:29:31 AM PDT by familyop

Catholic Judges in Capital Cases

Amy Coney Barrett, Notre Dame Law School
John H. Garvey

Document Type
Article

Publication Date
1998

Publication Information
81 Marq. L. Rev. 303 (1997-1998)

Abstract
The Catholic Church's opposition to the death penalty places Catholic judges in a moral and legal bind. While these judges are obliged by oath, professional commitment, and the demands of citizenship to enforce the death penalty, they are also obliged to adhere to their church's teaching on moral matters. Although the legal system has a solution for this dilemma by allowing the recusal of judges whose convictions keep them from doing their job, Catholic judges will want to sit whenever possible without acting immorally. However, litigants and the general public are entitled to impartial justice, which may be something a judge who is heedful of ecclesiastical pronouncements cannot dispense. Therefore, the authors argue, we need to know whether judges are legally disqualified from hearing cases that their consciences would let them decide. While mere identification of a judge as Catholic is not sufficient reason for recusal under federal law, the authors suggest that the moral impossibility of enforcing capital punishment in such cases as sentencing, enforcing jury recommendations, and affirming are in fact reasons for not participating.

Comments
Reprinted with permission of Marquette Law Review.

Recommended Citation
Barrett, Amy Coney and Garvey, John H., "Catholic Judges in Capital Cases" (1998). Journal Articles. 527.
https://scholarship.law.nd.edu/law_faculty_scholarship/527

(Excerpt) Read more at scholarship.law.nd.edu ...

[familyop]

We do need someone who is strong on the Second Amendment and has a record to show for it, though. Too many of the Democrats have been disseminating promotions of violence while being most obsessed towards disarming conservatives. The time ahead could very be dangerous, if Democrats are allowed to do that.

[rktman]

McCain might even show up.

[jdsteel]

Opinions and a certain body part.

Everybody has one.

[fortheDeclaration]

So the Biden Rule was not about lame duck status but a coming election?

[DoodleDawg]

So the Biden Rule was not about lame duck status but a coming election?

Yes. He said it in a speech on the Senate floor in 1992 and meant it for Bush, who was not a lame duck at the time.

[DoodleDawg]

So the Biden Rule was not about lame duck status but a coming election?

Yes. He said it in a speech on the Senate floor in 1992 and meant it for Bush, who was not a lame duck at the time.