Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Freeborn

“...the electoral college was the means to ensure it was the states that elected the Executive.”

No, it was intended to keep the big states from controlling an election.

Why do you think the Left now hates the electoral college?


130 posted on 08/21/2019 4:41:08 PM PDT by odawg
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 53 | View Replies ]


To: odawg

Throughout much of our history, the easiest way to get to a majority was via the big states. With big states out of play, smaller states are much more important.


151 posted on 08/21/2019 5:31:15 PM PDT by scrabblehack
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 130 | View Replies ]

To: odawg
"No, it was intended to keep the big states from controlling an election."

I disagree. The Senate, with two senators from each state regardless of population, was to ensure that each state had equal representation. The Electoral college awards electors to states based upon the combined number of senators and representatives. That is why California has 55 electors and Montana has 3.

197 posted on 08/22/2019 8:55:57 AM PDT by Freeborn
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 130 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson