[rintintin]

As a traditional national security conservative”

Tulsi echoes Trump on foreign policy: No more useless, costly regime-change wars. The Democrats don’t like that message. Neither do the establishment Bushian Republicans.

BTW, attacking other countries to bring about regime change is not “traditional national security conservatism” It’s Troskyite world revolutionism. No wonder a lot of the neocons who push that line of foreign policy have a lineage back to Troskyites.

[Jim Noble]

“BTW, attacking other countries to bring about regime change is not “traditional national security conservatism” It’s Troskyite world revolutionism. No wonder a lot of the neocons who push that line of foreign policy have a lineage back to Troskyites.”

+100

[Zhang Fei]

[BTW, attacking other countries to bring about regime change is not “traditional national security conservatism” It’s Troskyite world revolutionism. No wonder a lot of the neocons who push that line of foreign policy have a lineage back to Troskyites.]

---

Jefferson is a Trotskyite? Caesar was a Trotskyite? Regime change has been a tool of foreign policy pretty much since long before the term “foreign policy” was coined.