Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Penelope Dreadful
Back then in 1949, and in the 1950s, they had a minimum wage that was actually “livable”!

A reason for that, was women still weren't in the workforce to the degree they are now. More women in the workforce means a higher supply of labor, meaning downward pressure on wages.

187 posted on 08/22/2019 2:52:12 PM PDT by dfwgator (Endut! Hoch Hech!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 186 | View Replies ]


To: dfwgator

If the minimum wage is $3.00 per hour, then any additional workforce must be paid that same amount per hour. Period.

I think you are just flailing around trying to not have to come to grips with the fact that minimum wages are legal, and a good thing, and even better if a livable amount.

Minimum is the operative term. If 1 Billion women join the workforce, and the Minimum wage is $3.00 per hour, what is the least amount the women must be paid per hour??? (This is NOT a trick question!) The answer is $3.00 per hour.

Downward wage pressure may indeed impact wages above the minimum wage. Which is why the HB1s


189 posted on 08/22/2019 3:02:40 PM PDT by Penelope Dreadful (And there is Pansies, that's for Thoughts.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 187 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson