Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Penelope Dreadful

SO, then welfare is not a problem then? I mean, they WANT more so we should just pay right? Dumbest thing I have heard all day?

By the way, do those recipients better themselves? Um no.


133 posted on 08/22/2019 12:19:34 PM PDT by BizBroker ("You may ignore reality, but you may not ignore the consequences of ignoring reality.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 131 | View Replies ]


To: BizBroker

You lost me. Why is welfare not a problem? Gee, I guess if I can get say $25,000 per year on welfare, and have my time to myself, including the ability to work for cash somewhere, or go to a job paying $7.25 per hour, or about $15,000 per year, then I might just stay on welfare! Is that what you mean?

Or, are you talking about the welfare that the rest of the country has to pay so that WalMart, for example, can continue to pay its employees a sub-livable wage? Did you even see the video Cent-va put above.

I am still waiting for your answer on Mazlow, and on whether or not you personally “stopped” when you hit the “paying for the bare necessities” stage. They are simple questions. Yes and/or no would work for me!


135 posted on 08/22/2019 12:30:23 PM PDT by Penelope Dreadful (And there is Pansies, that's for Thoughts.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 133 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson