But what if the views expressed really are the shooter’s? And they’re the same as the ones expressed here all the time? Is that not a tiny bit interesting?
“But what if the views expressed really are the shooter’s? And they’re the same as the ones expressed here all the time? Is that not a tiny bit interesting?”
No, it’s a absurd smear. Do I need to Report Abuse on you? I think so. Here’s your reasoning:
A website focusing on personal freedoms and liberties and the government’s role in respecting them has forum members who attack personal freedoms and liberty and advocate the government revoking them.
These Leftist shooters are the antithesis of FReepers. They have no respect for personal liberties, freedoms or human life and advocate the government taking them away.
Anyone who conflates these Leftist shooters with FR is a a dupe and tool of the Left.
Complete and utter bullshit. This and the Texas shooting are today's 'Reichstag Fire' - with Democrat candidates exposing their ugly plans, with the ugly Democrat inner city failures exposed and with the IG report about to come out, the only hope is to change the national news to guns and claim white nationalism is the problem.
That other young man no more wrote that (obvious focus group tested) manifesto himself than I wrote the last Papal Encyclical.
Baseless what-ifs are counterproductive unto dangerous.
What if you’re actually a serial rapist with women caged in your basement? Should I call the cops to be sure?
I read the supposed TX shooter’s manifesto.
The guy is a millennial progressive who wants to retain ethnic identity. He sounded too stupid about guns to be “one of us”.
When one of our nutcases goes over the line, it’s going to be very different from these mass shootings.