i read part of the sicko’s manifesto=- (IF it is his) and the way he describes using an AK, and it not being ‘optimal’ , and wishing he had an AR 15 because it can supposedly do more damage somehow- sounded just really fishy to me- like he was making a concerted effort to point out to the public that these two guns need to be banned- His ‘manifesto’ just sounded like something a leftie would concur up to scare people into banning the guns- it didn’t sound like something someone would just write about in a lunatic’s manifesto- usually lunatics who write those things are ranting about certain people, or the government- or some system, and they are NOT describing, in detail, a gun’s supposed abilities- and what they will use-
It almost makes one wonder if the left didn’t organize the shooting to both distract, and to push for gun confiscations-
I lived in CA.
I owned an AK-47 and had 30 Round Magazines and a Bayonet.
CA decided it was an evil Assault Weapon and must be Registered.
Later on I decided I didn’t like being on “the list”, so I sold it to an out of State Buyer (and made a tidy profit).
Then I went out and bought a “CA Legal” AR-15.
Then the CA Politicos decided that my “CA Legal” AR-15 was no longer CA Legal.
I moved to MS.