Posted on 08/02/2019 12:02:34 PM PDT by MacNaughton
Politicians have a constitutional right to be stupid, but Pete Buttigieg is taking advantage of that right. Pete is wrong about religion, abortion, and homosexuality. I don't want someone with three major failures in the White House.
In a recent conversation with USA Today, Buttigieg characterized conservative Christians as "saying so much about what Christ said so little about, and so little about what he said so much about." Pete was using the absence of evidence argument i.e., since Christ didn't prohibit perversion, then criticism of LGBTQ crowd is wrong. However, that is fallacious, since Christ didn't speak about cannibalism, but I assume, though not sure, that Pete would not defend it. Pete is parroting the same silly, shallow argument that Christ's words are more important than other Scripture, but that undercuts scriptural authority. If a statement is in the Bible, it is to be properly interpreted by the context.
If it is biblical, it doesn't matter whether Christ said it or not. Moses and the Apostle Paul surely made it clear that perversion is an abnormality, an aberration, and an abomination. ...
(Excerpt) Read more at americanthinker.com ...
It is so good that we have you to turn to, you who know the secrets of all men's heart, you who exercise perfect judgement in all things. /s
We thought forcing Christians to bake cakes for them was bad.....think again, they will at some point demand the Bible be rewritten, specifically any mention of homosexuality being deleted. They will then redefine marriage as a union between one man/one woman and one man/one man or one woman/one woman. Dont think it wont happen.
It is so good that we have you to turn to, you who know the secrets of all men’s heart, you who exercise perfect judgement in all things. /s
Already happened in 2012.
What is the Queen James Bible?
And they can be relentless. I once witnessed a homoerotic male harass a heterosexual male for months on the job. The man’s girlfriend decided there must be some secret attraction, and blamed the boyfriend. He was caught in the middle between two lustful and jealous creatures. It destroyed the man’s relationship. Nothing happened to the homoerotic male, who was sneaky and deceitful.
Epilogue: The man, a flaming leftist Canadian who worshipped Noam Chomsky, turned into the most rabid hater of homoerotic males I have ever seen. He flew into violent rants against all homoerotics in public places at the slightest reminder of what the other male had done to his life.
I had known this young man for several years. Prior to that, he had always been affable and courteous with all. He was very smart and not vulgar. I was dismayed to see what happened to him.
Rock Hudson reputedly did the same thing to a happily-married man on a movie set. He hounded the man until he accepted a homoerotic liaison. I do not excuse the man, but what Hudson did to him was unconscionable - and an abuse of implicit power over the employee.
His whole lifestyle is biologically and spiritually wrong.
Well said. It is the Revelation to, not by, John.
Blunt but true.
The next curtain that President Trump will pull aside:
First: Exposed the media
Second: Exposed the dems for caring about illegals over Americans
Third: The Horrible condition of dem controlled inner cities.
Next is my wish: Expose the danger of grooming children about gender change.
Too many others to list.
Tell me the last time s leftist homo was right about anything?
I knew someone was going to hit me with that one.
So, it’s you, MacNaughton.
I have a theory that says “if you like someone, you can forgive the little things and in some cases, the big things.”
But if you do NOT like someone for whatever reason “you just can’t understand nor forgive the slightest annoyance.”
President is the former for me. I’m convinces he feels he has enough controversy slung at him. Why add to it?
I am fully expecting the alphabet crowd wsill eventually demand the changing of names on any institution named after St. Paul.
That being said, I do agree that
He will have zero luck decriminalizing homosexuality in the Muslim world where the bulk of the executions occur. And I doubt he will do anything to temper the current PC climate regarding sexual identity confusion.
You are very wise, MacNaughton.
I am not at all puffed up at you. Some of my family felt the same way you did, they just did not like the alternative, and I, fool that I am, did NOT vote for him, this man has won me over and now I find myself defending whenever I can.
Regards.
It is probably because gay people are happy and content.Now homosexuals and queers are a horse of a different color. They are neither happy nor content.
ALL HAIL SIR PETER THE BUTTPLUG.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.