It would be more persuasive if Trump refuted specific false statements of Cummings.
The hysteria coming from the Dems and Nevertrumpers tells me Trump has it exactly right.
And it nothing to do with Cumming’s false facts. It has to do with Cummings demeaning a border agent in front of world at a congressional hearing
No it wouldn’t
It would be more persuasive if Trump refuted specific false state.
He’s too busy refuting that Cummings is a decent man who cares about his constitutnts.
Actually it wouldn't.
That is what Republicans have tried to do for decades and the left just laughs at them for it. The media gives it no coverage, the people pay no attention to it and the Dems twist it and make it into something that works for them.
Trump is turning all of that on its head and effectively controlling the narrative.
No.
It would never come across to the average person when bullying and disgusting Behavior are not met with a strong clear unequivocal and blunt response the behavior it’s not refuted
It would be more persuasive if Trump refuted specific false statements of Cummings.
***************
Actions speak louder than words. Cummings is a hypocrite. He points his finger at a man who works tirelessly and without pay to improve the living conditions in this country while cummings turns a blind eye at the filth in his own house, and gets paid a pretty penny in the process.
I personally am glad the President speaks plain English rather than pretending to be something he isn’t, like cummings does. Cummings is a pretentious, pompus ass.
No it wouldn't. You want to go back to the way things used to be and how the repugnant repubs were in the past - THAT DIDN'T WORK! We finally have a president with some balls and guts to go after these lying scum buckets. You want to fight war from the democRATS with civility. How's that worked in the past????