Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Towed_Jumper

Your average 16-year-old male these days is not as mature as the average one 50 years ago. I’d rather see a renewed focus on getting teens in shape, which would presumably make a significant chunk of those “17- to 24-year-olds who are ineligible to serve” eligible.


15 posted on 07/21/2019 8:42:38 AM PDT by Stravinsky
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


To: Stravinsky

18 should be the minimum age. I don’t want to see 17 or 16 year old kids in the military.


45 posted on 07/21/2019 9:00:59 AM PDT by Georgia Girl 2 (The only purpose of a pistol is to fight your way back to the rifle you should never have dropped)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies ]

To: Stravinsky

There’s a considerable chunk of the already serving that are not even close to being in shape for anything other than sitting behind a desk.


80 posted on 07/21/2019 9:54:04 AM PDT by PIF (They came for me and mine ... now it is your turn ...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson