Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

9th Circuit rules in favor of Trump admin in 'sanctuary city' case
The Hill ^ | July 12, 2019 | Tal Axelrod

Posted on 07/12/2019 2:18:18 PM PDT by jazusamo

The Ninth Circuit Court of Appeals Friday ruled in favor of the Trump administration's efforts to prioritize federal dollars for local policing to towns and cities that complied with certain immigration policies.

The ruling, a split 2-1 decision, ruled that the Justice Department was within its rights to withhold Community Oriented Policing Services (COPS) grants from sanctuary cities and states over their refusal to work with federal immigration enforcement authorities and instead prioritize agencies that focused on unauthorized immigration and agreed to give Immigration and Customs Enforcement (ICE) access to jail records and immigrants in custody.

The city of Los Angeles first sued the administration after it was denied a $3 million grant on the grounds that it did not receive the money because it did not focus on immigration for its community policing grant application. The decision reversed a district court’s ruling.

“The panel rejected Los Angeles’s argument that DOJ’s practice of giving additional consideration to applicants that choose to further the two specified federal goals violated the Constitution’s Spending Clause,” wrote Judge Sandra Ikuta, joined by Judge Jay Bybee.

“The panel held that DOJ did not exceed its statutory authority in awarding bonus points to applicants that selected the illegal immigration focus area or that agreed to the Certification.”

Judge Kim Wardlaw wrote in dissent that the Justice Department’s efforts to prioritize immigration in determining the awarding of COPS grants was “Orwellian” and said the majority’s ruling goes “astray.”

“The majority goes astray by finding no meaning in Congress’s use of the term ‘community-oriented policing’ and then deferring under Chevron to DOJ’s Orwellian effort to define ‘community-oriented policing’ to include “partnering with federal law enforcement to address illegal immigration,” she wrote.

“Congress did not authorize COPS grants for anything other than placing additional state and local cops on the beat and promote community partnerships.”

Congress created the fund in 1994 to provide federal assistance to state and local law enforcement to get more cops on beats and improve police-community interaction. It allowed the Justice Department to administer the funds.

President Trump has repeatedly railed against sanctuary cities as he touts his hardline immigration stances.

He floated the idea earlier this year of retaliating by releasing undocumented immigrants and refugees and last year to the cities. He also issued an executive order last year blocking sanctuary cities from receiving certain federal funding. San Francisco sued over the order, and ultimately won its case.


TOPICS: Constitution/Conservatism; Crime/Corruption; Culture/Society; Government; News/Current Events; US: California
KEYWORDS: 9thcircuit; 9thcircuitcourt; aliens; cops; federalfunds; illegalaliens; judiciary; losangeles; presidenttrump; sanctuarycities; trump
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-49 last
To: jazusamo
The precedent was set a long time ago when the Federal Government threatened to withhold Federal Highway funds to any state that would not raise their drinking age to 21, then to lower the minimum BAC to 0.08%.

So the Federal Government can add any conditions to the disbursement of Federal funds that it chooses.

41 posted on 07/12/2019 4:10:20 PM PDT by Yo-Yo ( is the /sarc tag really necessary?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: jazusamo

We’re going to see more and more sane judgments from the formerly nutty Ninth as Trump rams one Strict Constructionist after another down their Leftie Senators’ throats.

The thought of Trump winning another term and flipping the 9th Circuit is almost too good to be true.


42 posted on 07/12/2019 4:20:19 PM PDT by FLT-bird
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: momincombatboots

Still have one p!ssing in the punch bowl. More work to be done.


43 posted on 07/12/2019 4:24:28 PM PDT by beelzepug (OCD and proud of it!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: Oldeconomybuyer
“Near freezing in hell”.

And pigs have suddenly begun to fly!

44 posted on 07/12/2019 4:53:29 PM PDT by Colonelbuzzsaw (USAF AIR BATTLE MANAGER, retired, Trump supporter, Hurricane Michael survivor)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 32 | View Replies]

To: jazusamo

YES!

Time to start cutting all sorts of funds to blue cities and states.


45 posted on 07/12/2019 6:07:21 PM PDT by Farcesensitive
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: McGavin999

“Watch them scream when they can’t be counted.”

They may scream, but as has been displayed in the past, they will vote.

rwood


46 posted on 07/12/2019 6:46:36 PM PDT by Redwood71
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 24 | View Replies]

To: Whenifhow; null and void; aragorn; EnigmaticAnomaly; kalee; Kale; 2ndDivisionVet; azishot; ...

p


47 posted on 07/12/2019 7:34:38 PM PDT by bitt (US intel is there to protect the safety and security of Americans. It is not a political tool.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: jazusamo

not a sure victory until the plaintiffs are unable to succeed in seeking an En Banc review ....


48 posted on 07/12/2019 9:04:31 PM PDT by ExSES (the "bottom-line")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: jazusamo

That’s the whole deal with federal funds - there’s supposed to be strings attached.


49 posted on 07/13/2019 3:41:13 AM PDT by trebb (Don't howl about illegal leeches, or Trump in general, while not donating to FR - it's hypocritical.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-49 last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson