Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: bgill

Is this “minor” offense actually a minor offense? If it’s involving a young woman unmistakably past puberty, we have a problem that is as much a factor of our modern attitudes towards prolonging childhood, as it is of “pedophilia.” Go easy on the guy if that’s his sole incident of vice. He might even be trying to make it up by benefiting the girls’ school. Sometimes we can get as badly underfoot with God as cats can get under our feet.


10 posted on 07/12/2019 2:29:39 PM PDT by HiTech RedNeck (May Jesus Christ be praised.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


To: HiTech RedNeck

Or Epstein and Clinton were paying first to obtain sweet little benefits.


13 posted on 07/12/2019 3:25:20 PM PDT by bgill
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies ]

To: HiTech RedNeck

And what of serial fornication?

I do oppose the artificial prolongation of childhood. I also oppose promiscuity and exploitation. And then there is the issue of statutory law.

This is not about a single, older man marrying a single, younger woman, and remaining faithful to her.


21 posted on 07/12/2019 11:57:43 PM PDT by YogicCowboy ("I am not entirely on anyone's side, because no one is entirely on mine." - J. R. R. Tolkien)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson