Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Trump appeals U.S. judge's border wall funding ruling
Reuters ^ | June 29, 2019 | Jan Wolf

Posted on 06/29/2019 11:35:29 AM PDT by Trump20162020

U.S. President Donald Trump on Saturday appealed a U.S. judge’s ruling that blocked his administration from using $2.5 billion in funds intended for anti-drug activities to construct a wall along the southern border with Mexico.

U.S. Department of Justice lawyers said in a court filing that they were formally appealing Friday’s ruling to the 9th U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals.

“[W]e’re immediately appealing it, and we think we’ll win the appeal,” Trump said during a press conference on Saturday at a summit of leaders of the Group of 20 (G20) major economies in Japan.

On Friday, U.S. District Court Judge Haywood Gilliam in Oakland, California said in a pair of court decisions that the Trump administration’s proposal to transfer Defense Department funds intended for anti-drug activities was unlawful.

(Excerpt) Read more at reuters.com ...


TOPICS: Front Page News; Government
KEYWORDS: borderwall; buildthewall; clownbammyjudge; donaldtrump; fence; gilliam; haywoodgilliam; judiciary; obamajudge; obamajudges; trump; wall
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-40 last
To: Trump20162020; eyeamok; rktman

21 posted on 06/29/2019 1:05:16 PM PDT by 4Liberty ("The Democrats are the Party of Crime." - Donald J. Trump)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Trump20162020

President Trump.. Go ahead and appeal, but continue what your doing and build that wall!!!


22 posted on 06/29/2019 1:08:00 PM PDT by tallyhoe
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: eyeamok

I agree with you. Trump once again putting us at the mercy of the Judiciary where the back stabbing traitor Roberts is at the end of the road with the knife ready to shove it in our back. And when the SC sides with the Rats it’s well gee l tried. Meanwhile the invasion continues and Texas edges ever closer to falling and then it’s truly over.


23 posted on 06/29/2019 1:18:30 PM PDT by gibsonguy
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies]

To: IndispensableDestiny
It's amazing how much power the judiciary has seized for itself, with the fairly recent phenomenon of nationwide injunctions, which they started going crazy with in the last decade, and the fact that courts overturn and rule more laws unconstitutional now than they ever would have dreamed in like the 1800s.

The Founding Fathers never intended the courts to be this powerful. They need to be reigned in, and I don't care if it happens when a Democrat is President and it could hurt Republicans attempting to resist him or her, just make it happen, please.

24 posted on 06/29/2019 1:48:25 PM PDT by Trump20162020
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies]

To: Trump20162020

What a system we have where a judge can overrule the other branches of government. Ignore the rule of law. And not have to prove anything in order for his ruling to take effect. What about Equal powers?

It will be at least a year and maybe two before all this plays out. In the meanwhile the USA will be Cultural, Criminal, Medical, and Financial toast. How could one judge have such power?


25 posted on 06/29/2019 1:57:24 PM PDT by Revel
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Trump20162020

That is the hope, that as it will end up in SCOTUS, they will rule sensibly and legally.


26 posted on 06/29/2019 2:13:12 PM PDT by Innovative
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: HANG THE EXPENSE

Another question. Who’s payroll is the judge on?


27 posted on 06/29/2019 2:14:37 PM PDT by Dutch Boy
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: Dutch Boy; All
Another question. Who’s payroll is the judge on?

Ours.

Next question? What ideology does the Judge use for his decisions?

It isn't that of the Founders, or of a Limited, Republican government.

It is Progressivism.

28 posted on 06/29/2019 2:19:40 PM PDT by marktwain (President Trump and his supporters are the Resistance. His opponents are the Reactionaries.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 27 | View Replies]

To: marktwain

I was referring to possible 3rd party payroll. Way too many of these judges seem to go against the written law just to thwart Trump. They are either on someones payroll or are corrupt. Either way, they should be removed. There is a difference in a ruling that we don’t like but is supported by the law and a judge just making things up as they go along.


29 posted on 06/29/2019 2:24:35 PM PDT by Dutch Boy
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 28 | View Replies]

To: R_Kangel

That is a great idea, and has been suggested before! IIRC, a Congressman, whose name I cannot recall, has offered legislation to that effect.

The problem is, no one seems to know where the money ($14 Billion) is!


30 posted on 06/29/2019 4:25:35 PM PDT by Taxman (We will never be a truly free people so long as we have the income tax and the IRS.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: All

Do not appeal it. Simply ignore it. The judge has no jurisdiction. Show me the law that enabled the _ruling_.


31 posted on 06/29/2019 4:32:42 PM PDT by veracious (UN=OIC=Islam ; USAgov may be radically changed, just amend USConstitution)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: Trump20162020

If we had a functioning congress, this black-robe fascist would be impeached and removed.

Since we don’t have such an animal as a functioning congress, the duty to punish these black-robe traitors will fall to the people and their myriad constitutional resources.


32 posted on 06/29/2019 4:50:33 PM PDT by sergeantdave (Teach a man to fish and he'll steal your gear and sell it)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Trump20162020

The 9th is very likely to reverse with a 3-panel.


33 posted on 06/29/2019 6:54:47 PM PDT by montag813
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: veracious

“....Do not appeal it. Simply ignore it. The judge has no jurisdiction. Show me the law that enabled the _ruling_....”
Exactly. He has no standing on this.
Since the libs have already destroyed the “Rule of Law” in this country, just ignore this useless, anti-American odongo turd. He has no battalions, divisions, etc. to enforce his heinous ruling. He’s nothing but a sheep in wolf’s clothing...bad joke.
Ignore him and do what needs to be done to protect this country and our way of life.


34 posted on 06/29/2019 8:50:51 PM PDT by lgjhn23 (It's easy to be liberal when you're dumber than a box of rocks.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 31 | View Replies]

To: gibsonguy
Trump once again putting us at the mercy of the Judiciary

Do you think before you post? Rinos in the senate are looking for an excuse to remove Trump from office. Roberts apparently does not think district judges issuing nationwide injunctions are a problem. And I doubt congress is going to help.

35 posted on 06/29/2019 9:33:19 PM PDT by ding_dong_daddy_from_dumas (Mozart tells you what it's like to be human. Bach tells you what it's like to be the universe)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 23 | View Replies]

To: Trump20162020

lets hope it goes directly to the DC court and not the sewer 9th. That is a waste of time.


36 posted on 06/30/2019 6:19:09 AM PDT by klsparrow
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: ding_dong_daddy_from_dumas

“Do you think before you post? “

Yes, start your counter with a personal attack as it always helps ones cause. The Republic hangs by a thread but because of fear of what the Senate RINOs might do lets let Judicial hacks run border policy. Obongo ignored Judges on more than one occasion I would like to see Trump do it once and if there was ever a time it is now. Especially when we have Roberts standing at the end of the road waiting to screw us again.


37 posted on 06/30/2019 6:54:03 AM PDT by gibsonguy
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 35 | View Replies]

To: gibsonguy
There is a difference between Obama defying a ruling and Trump doing it. There was no serious impeachment effort even after O defied the DACA ruling, but there has been an impeachment drum beat before Trump does anything of the sort. We have too many Romneys in the senate.

You say Trump "lets Judicial hacks run border policy" when in fact I think the appeal he filed will be successful, but if Roberts is determined to do the wrong thing and RBG stays on the court, that will be grim. I think we need to see what happens.

38 posted on 06/30/2019 8:14:15 AM PDT by ding_dong_daddy_from_dumas (Mozart tells you what it's like to be human. Bach tells you what it's like to be the universe)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 37 | View Replies]

To: ding_dong_daddy_from_dumas

“I think the appeal he filed will be successful,”

Well I hope your optimism is rewarded. The appeal process could drag on for months or even years. With tens of thousands of new Rat voters pouring over the border every month is it time the Republic has? And again there sits Roberts...


39 posted on 06/30/2019 9:16:07 AM PDT by gibsonguy
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 38 | View Replies]

To: gibsonguy

I hate the open borders and Trump does too. But both parties have been trying to provoke him into making a fatal political mistake.


40 posted on 06/30/2019 9:58:40 AM PDT by ding_dong_daddy_from_dumas (Mozart tells you what it's like to be human. Bach tells you what it's like to be the universe)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 39 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-40 last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson