[DiogenesLamp]

If you start funding my candidacy, and then I say or do something asinine (or merely something you disagree with), you have every right to say ‘no more $$ for you” that very second (barring some sort of legal contract). And vice versa.

I don't think they pulled his funding over any particular thing that he said. They pulled his funding because a couple of kook women accused him of molesting one and attempting to rape the other, and the media amplified this to 11!

No one in the party stopped to ask "is this fair to Moore"?

When they did this same trick to Brett Kavanaugh, a lot of people caught on to this tactic of getting kook women to make false sexual accusations against Republicans.

[RedStateRocker]

I’m not disputing the vapidity of the ‘reasoning’ or their justification. I’m merely being my usual pedantic self and commenting that ‘due process’ is not something one should expect from bedwetting RINOs of no moral conviction (except sucking at the public tit and milking taxpayers for everything they can)

I have my own reasons for somewhat disliking Moore, which are of no import.

“is this fair to Moore”?

My dad once told me “’Fair’ is a place you go to ride ponies and eat cotton candy, son”