Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: rktman

Elizabeth Warren is supposed to be the candidate of feminists, just as Pete Buttigieg is the candidate of homosexuals. According to the latest RCP polling averages, Mayor Pete has higher numbers in Iowa and New Hampshire than Elizabeth Warren.

What does that mean? Do moderate states like Iowa and New Hampshire have more homosexuals than feminists? Or is Elizabeth Warren such a poor candidate that she’s unable to attract feminist voters? She could at least try to attract lesbians from Mayor Pete’s numbers. Instead, what does she do but offer a big beer night — but to whom? Only if she’s trying to attract the he-man, Hell’s Angels crowd, who would never vote for her in a million years, does this make sense.


26 posted on 06/09/2019 8:10:59 AM PDT by humbleexpert
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


To: humbleexpert

This is so calculated I wonder if she’s going for a butch image.


38 posted on 06/09/2019 9:41:22 AM PDT by Yaelle
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 26 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson