Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: crusher2013
Thanks for the link. No indication here that hard vote counts came out of this study, or could come from it; the study was of search ranking bias not voting, and his vote numbers are qualified as "possibly":

“I actually set up a small-scale monitoring system which worked beautifully, and which looked at bias in search rankings that people were seeing before the 2016 election, looking at Google, Bing, and Yahoo, not just Google. I was able to preserve more than 13,000 election-related searches, more than 90,000 web pages to which the search results linked,” he explained.

“I was able to analyze this looking for bias toward either Clinton or Trump in search results. I found a very clear bias toward Mrs. Clinton, enough to shift possibly 2 or 3 million votes

143 posted on 06/07/2019 8:12:02 AM PDT by NobleFree ("law is often but the tyrant's will, and always so when it violates the right of an individual")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 140 | View Replies ]


To: NobleFree

Are you really taking the position that social media has no affect on elections?

and that the left having complete domination and censorship of conservatives on social media will not swing elections in their favor?

I suppose you think that the television networks have never had influence on elections either.


148 posted on 06/07/2019 1:41:46 PM PDT by crusher2013
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 143 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson