You’re lazy.
You finally said something truthful. I'm hella lazy.
But my lazy ass has seen printouts of the sealed indictment lists. Several of them, matter of fact. Posted by people who have access to Pacer (which I don't).
I don't recall seeing any names attached to the "sealed" indictments or warrants.
You made the statement that there were 30k indictments filed, and then updated it to 90k. You really have no idea how many there are or what they contain, do you. Yet you flap your gums. You're just blowing smoke and pretending to be knowledgeable, right?
Just because there maybe over 90k federal indictments does not imply in any way they are related to the coup attempt.
This is a valid point. Neither you or I know what those sealed indictments contain or their subject. Yet you are SURE that not one of them is related to and derp state skullduggery.
Why? What secret knowledge do you have? The fact that there are 90k when they yearly average was 1k before doesn't seem to phase you and you fail to address that issue. Why?
PACER reveals there are proceedings as well as indictments.
Thank you, Perry Mason.
Sealed indictments are routine legal procedure as are warrants which are also sealed
Yep. And they don't have a name attached for public (or suspect) consumption, now do they? Yet you know what they are NOT.
You`d know that if you had an inkling of basic legal procedures.
Says the guy who KNOWS what the SEALED indictments DON'T pertain to.
Federal Judicial Center- 80% of sealed cases based on warrant applications or tracking devices.
Okay. Let's say that's true for the sake of argument. I don't have an inkling of math skills either, but 20% of 90k seems like a much larger number than 20% of 1k. Help me out with the math. I'm lazy.
Explain the discrepencies. Since you seem to be the legal expert with secret knowledge.
Anyway. We had this same argument over a year ago, right? Since then, lots has happened. Lots that we were told was going to happen. Lots that you are now aware of.
And still cling to the "nothing's happening" meme?
I don't get you, pear.
And there's Little Jeremiah's posts re Huber's investigations. I'll put Part 1 of her posts below should others take an interest in documented evidence re ongoing investigations.
~~~~
Little Jeremiah: Very well informed, researched and fascinating thread on U1, CF, and complaints that Huber isn’t “doing anything”. I will copy some but not all due to time/focus restraints. As soon as I format to make images show up, wall of text ensues, so click to read/see images.
Tracybeanz
@tracybeanz
7 hours ago, 44 tweets, 10 min read
https://threadreaderapp.com/thread/1076926742449872896.html
1. THREAD: This piece came out by Paul Sperry from RealClearInvestigations. I appreciate and respect the author very much. He has done fantastic work, and what I am about to outline for you in no way changes my opinions in that regard.
https://www.realclearinvestigations.com/articles/2018/12/22/john_huber_vanishing_savior_for_gop.html
2. However, I would be remiss if I didn’t point out some of the inconsistencies and issues with this grim outlook on where we are in terms of the slow trek of justice against the criminals who have been
operating unchecked for decades.
3. “RCI has learned from potential witnesses, their lawyers, and others close to the investigations, that Huber has not impaneled a GJ to subpoena witnesses or hear evidence” (cont)
4. (cont) This statement speaks ONLY to people that assume they would be witnesses, and we do not know who “others close to the investigations” are.
5. Again, I respect Sperry immensely, but I treat all anon sources the same, whether CNN or a Trump/anti-establishment news source. But that isn’t the biggest issue at hand here. Read the following excerpt:
https://pbs.twimg.com/media/DvIBE1uWkAAgY2N.jpg
6. Toensig makes a point to call out Attorney Huber here, however what is being completely overlooked in this statement is an active and ONGOING investigation into U1. I want to show you why this is the truth- that the DOJ IS INVESTIGATING U1 AS WE SPEAK.
7. On January 12, 2018 the DOJ released the following “Former President of Maryland Based Transportation Company Indicted on 11 Counts Related to Foreign Bribery, Fraud, and Money Laundering Scheme”
https://pbs.twimg.com/media/DvIBK-ZWwAAoMbB.jpg
8. The indictment specifically mentions Vadim Mikerin, a director at TENEX- he was sentenced to prison in 2015. Also, Lamberts copresident was sentenced in 2015 on his part in this scam. And that begs the question- why was the PRESIDENT of the company indicted in 2018?
https://pbs.twimg.com/media/DvIBQj0XcAEsYdM.jpg
9. We get a bigger look into what is going on here if we check PACER. The case is open, under seal, and ongoing, however we are privy to a few different details that allow us some insight into what is happening. Lets take a look at the docket.
https://pbs.twimg.com/media/DvIBTbCWkAALbyj.jpg
10. There is activity on this case as late as November 23rd. If we take a look at the case history, we find we are able to view a transcript. This is a transcript of a status conference on the case.
11. There are a number of very important pieces of information here. The transcript was from a hearing on 9/4/18. At issue here is the following: The DOJ is arguing with the defendant.
12. The defendant is stating that he has been unable to review exculpatory evidence which is housed in a massive DOJ database. The DOJ is arguing that they have invited the defense in to use their software to review the documents.
13. The DOJ is stating that this massive DOE/DOJ database of evidence can be searched using keywords, and that the defense has not taken them up on their offer to view it. The defense is stating documents are corrupt.
14. The DOJ is stating- no, that isn’t true, those are SYSTEM FILES taken and intercepted while executing search warrants and subpoenas. I am about to show you some VERY interesting information about all of this that we can grab from the transcript. Mr. Salem is from the DOJ.
https://pbs.twimg.com/media/DvIBmP-WkAERFU5.jpg
15. And now— we learn that a lot of this data comes from – read CAREFULLY – SEARCH WARRANTS of TENEX and TENAM. Remember, TENEX is the Russian company, and TENAM is the US counterpart- BOTH MASSIVE players in U1. NO ONE has ever spoken of ANY search warrants on these companies.
https://pbs.twimg.com/media/DvIBsoMWkAUSCcR.jpg
16. You read that right! He states here that the US government executed SW on TENEX AND TENAM— and I think that normally the government doesn’t execute search warrants and grab hundreds of thousands of pieces of evidence in a “broad” case when they are not DOING ANYTHING.
17. AGAIN- THE DOJ has executed search warrants, and obtained, HUNDREDS OF THOUSANDS of pieces of evidence from TENEX and TENAM. I will let you just sit on this for a moment.
18. So, if NOTHING was happening with U1, and there wasn’t an ongoing and open investigation into U1, AND THE CF I would join the pity party of “nothing is happening, we are finished.” However, that clearly isn’t the case.
19. The DOJ has been working this case for nearly a year, and if this was announced there are certainly others. One more detail- The date of this indictment was 1/10/18. The date that the media began reporting the investigation into the Clinton Foundation? Also early January.
20. Now that we have BROADLY explored Uranium One, lets start to poke into the testimony of the whistleblowers in the CF scandal. Sperry states in his article the following:
https://pbs.twimg.com/media/DvICAr-X4AEtmXT.jpg
21. In reading this, one would think that these whistle blowers were at the end of their rope, completely frustrated with the lack of attention they were getting from the DOJ in regards to their evidence. However, that isn’t the case AT ALL.
22. Please listen to this exchange between Mr. Hice and Mr. Moynihan. Notice how they make clear that THEY were approached for this hearing, and not the other way around. This doesn’t jive particularly well with the statement made by Sperry.
https://video.twimg.com/ext_tw_video/1076926464837201921/pu/vid/320x180/1AVgHgCWJQ5Qz060.mp4?tag=6
23. Next, we learn that Huber was scheduled for the December 5th meeting, but then for some reason, he was NOT scheduled for the new one:
https://pbs.twimg.com/media/DvICSMtXgAAXe3V.jpg
24. Now, I want to go through a few of the things that WERE spoken about in this hearing- things that are completely overlooked and not mentioned in this article, just as we saw with the U1 case.
25. Ms. Norton in the hearing is attempting to downplay the interactions these whistleblowers have had with the IRS. Remember, these whistleblowers have approached the IRS and NUMEROUS DOJ officials with their 6k pages of evidence. Ms. Nortons job here as an agent in defense(con)
26. (con)of the Clintons is to downplay their info, by highlighting that the IRS denied their initial claim. However, there’s a problem with that- they are appealing this decision, and in their appeal, they highlight a VERY TELLING bit of information. Please watch this clip.
https://video.twimg.com/ext_tw_video/1076930468216492033/pu/vid/320x180/YWAI2vCfKRWeYVNE.mp4?tag=6
27. Why is this important? Because at the time this “raid” for lack of a better word happened, several intrepid internet investigators were tracking flights from DOJ to AR, and they saw this flight. It was heavily speculated at the time that this was, in fact, a raid on the CF.
28. Planes full of evidence.
[THERE IS A LOT MORE AND MANY MANY GRAPHICS! Anyone interested please click and read it all. Obviously a LOT is happening.]
https://threadreaderapp.com/thread/1076926742449872896.html
