Do you have links (outside of the FBI) that states King took part in or was witness to women being raped? Being a philanderer is a far cry from a rapist.
Thus far, only Garrow reading the FBI summation of the event. As I read on about King, it is highly plausible that this rape actually occurred as the FBI documented.
Equally disturbing is the lack of response by the FBI listening live in the adjoining room. At what point do the FBI stop a crime? What if she or he was a minor child? Or if the rapist proceeded to beat, torture, or kill her? Why does the FBI witness this crime and merely spectate?
The FBI agents witnessing King’s orgies must have been terribly disappointed when their years of free PORN shows ended with King’s death.
King had a wife, three regular girlfriends, and a line of groupies and attendees from his sermons/ speeches seeking to have sex as he traveled. There were orgies on a regular basis. This scenario of a rape in his presence goes with the territory of those documented sexual activities.
While I did not go to the source, yet. This excerpt from “The American Citadel” came from the March 1968 document dump of a grouping of previously sealed JFK files. It details how King was coercing women to perform lesbian sex acts for the entertainment of onlookers.
https://www.archives.gov/files/research/jfk/releases/104-10125-10133.pdf
https://theamericancitadel.com/2018/01/15/mlk-communist-revolutionary-plagiarizer-
degenerate/
-—Kings personal life was one of depravity and debauchery. He was a man of hedonistic excess. He lusted after alcohol and women and indulged himself with plenty of both. It is well-established that King frequently engaged in drunken sex orgies especially on his road trips. The FBI report contained this account of an urban leadership conference hosted by King:
One Negro minister in attendance later expressed his disgust with the behind-the-scenes drinking, fornication, and homosexuality that went on at the conference. Several Negro and white prostitutes were brought in from the Miami area. An all-night sex orgy was held with these prostitutes and some of the delegates in attendance.
One room had a large table in it which was filled with whiskey. The two Negro prostitutes were paid $50.00 to put on a sex show for the entertainment of guests. A variety of sex acts deviating from the normal were observed. These types of despicable orgies were quite normal for King and his entourage. In the report, we find this description of Kings lecherous behavior:
As early as January, 1964, King engaged in another two-day, drunken sex orgy in Washington, D.C. Many of those present engaged in sexual acts, natural as well as unnatural, for the entertainment of onlookers.
>>>When one of the females shied away from engaging in an unnatural act, King and other of the males present discussed how she was to be taught and initiated in this respect.
Throughout the ensuing years and until this date King has continued to carry on his sexual aberrations secretly while holding himself out to public view as a moral leader of religious conviction.
It was not enough that King himself was debauched; he felt the need to coerce women into lesbian acts for his own perverse entertainment. King was not a man of God, unless his god was the lord of the underworld, the instigator of sin, the Father of Lies. King was a hypocrite of the highest order a charlatan who hoodwinked a nation with his flattering, but pitifully hollow, words. ——————————————————————————————————————————————————————————————————————————
Actually, I have accepted the fact that Michael King was a perverted degenerate louse of the worse order and nothing further about his sexual exploits would be surprising; it fits his character. “.., judge a man by his character and not the color of his skin... blah, blah, blah.” Done that Mike King.
His blatant continuous plagiarism - intellectual theft of others ideas establishes his complete fraudulent nature. And if that does not shock or trouble your conscious, nothing will.
Most disturbing to me are the revelations of King’s ties, guidance, funding, support and involvement with the Communist Party coupled with his application with the State dept. to visit Russia in 1964 (it was refused.)
Communism & MLK -— http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/news/3752321/posts?page=127#127