Don’t HIJACK the thread to bash President Thomas Jefferson or put our fore-father in the same class with the charlatan Mike King, Jr.
Every time YOU try and hijack this thread to another topic to deflect from King’s sordid reputation, I will respond with documentation pertaining to King’s connections and activities. And none of it is purty; it just gets worse as the documents are analyzed.
MLK: Communist Revolutionary, Plagiarizer, Degenerate 1/15/2018 . Excerpted form the link below from The American Citadel
Martin Luther King, Jr. was a communist. You will never see that printed in an Establishment textbook, heralded in the controlled press, or mentioned in one of the numerous whitewashed MLK documentaries on the History Channel. Yet, despite officialdom’s deliberate cover-up of King’s communist activities and affiliations, the truth is that this so-called hero was actually a communist agent who worked to subvert our Republic.
King is today praised by many people as a literal prophet. He is seen as a visionary and a man of God. Even those who do not have any particular love for MLK consider him as a great social reformer – a man who fought for justice and opposed racism and discrimination. This deceptive image has been carefully crafted by the powers-that-be who are giddy that the American public has accepted King as a martyr. But just who was King, what type of person was he, and what did he really stand for?
Everything the public is told about this man is a false façade. Even King’s name is a forgery. Martin Luther King, Jr.’s real name was Michael King. His dad, a Baptist preacher, one day had an epiphany that he should call himself Martin Luther King. From that day onward he began addressing his son as Martin Luther King, Jr. Though not his birth name, it stuck – just like Vladimir Ilyich Ulyanov’s criminal alias “Lenin” and Joseph Vissarionovich Djugashvili’s code name “Stalin” stuck. To call Michael King by the name of a true Christian reformer – the Martin Luther who sparked the Protestant Reformation – is a disgrace.
King’s appropriation did not end with his name, however. It is a fact quietly admitted by official sources that MLK plagiarized substantial portions of his university dissertations, his books, and his public speeches. Martin Luther King, Jr. was a prolific and habitual cheater and liar. He plagiarized, without attribution, the writings of other thinkers throughout his entire life. He was an intellectual fraud. [His first sermon at Ebenezer Church was plagiarized nearly in its entirety.]
The editors of The Papers of Martin Luther King, Jr. project have stated that King’s writings were “tragically flawed by numerous instances of plagiarism.” It has further been discovered that substantial portions of his doctoral dissertation were outright stolen, without any attribution, from other writers. In short, he did not earn his doctoral degree; he swindled it. He was not a legitimate scholar; he was a cheater and a thief. Martin Luther King, Jr. should henceforth never be referred to as a doctor or reverend. If justice were to be served, King would have his doctoral and theological degrees stripped from him for his prolific plagiarism and conscious cheating.
I repeat again the truth that Martin Luther King, Jr. was a communist. This fact was well known to the FBI at the time. J. Edgar Hoover, one of the greatest anti-communist crusaders in our history, conducted a special investigation of King. While most of the FBI’s documents related to King are sealed and hidden away from the public, some have recently been declassified. During the recent dump of files related to JFK, a March 12, 1968 FBI report regarding King’s behind-the-scenes dealings was released. I have read this 23-page document in its entirety and I suggest you do the same if you are interested in the truth.
The document discusses MLK’s communist handlers. That is, the men who directed King’s affairs, wrote his speeches, advised him, worked alongside him, etc. Almost to a man, these people were communist agents. Perhaps the most important was the Jew Stanley David Levison, who was described in the report as a “shrewd, dedicated communist,” King’s “Assistant Chief,” and as one of MLK’s “principal advisors.” Levison wrote many of King’s speeches, directed him in what to say during press conferences, and even personally wrote entire chapters of a book ostensibly written by King titled Where Do We Go From Here: Chaos or Community?
As an admitted communist, Levison was particularly monitored by the FBI. Consequently, the FBI learned many things about King through Levison’s communications with fellow communists. For instance, the report contains these intriguing lines:
“Stanley Levison has told Clarence Jones, another advisor to King, that under no circumstances should King be permitted to say anything without their approving it. Levison also informed Jones that King is such a slow thinker he is usually not prepared to make statements without help from someone.” Perhaps King resorted to plagiarism precisely because he was such a “slow thinker.” At any rate, King was not his own man – he was a puppet of his communist advisors. He was the front man for the Civil Rights movement – a movement that was without question a communist front from top to bottom.
The same FBI report contained this nugget of information:
“The reason King enjoyed this close relationship with communists is best explained by the fact that Levison, in February, 1962, passed the word to Gus Hall, General Secretary, CPUSA, “King is a whole-hearted Marxist who has studied it (Marxism), believes in it and agrees with it, but because of his being a minister of religion, does not dare espouse it publicly.”” King was a closet communist who deliberately betrayed the trust of his parishioners by pretending he was something he was not. He was a wolf in sheep’s clothing – a Marxist in priestly frocks. He was a reverend of revolution, not an advocate of peace.
King’s true colors were seen whenever he went anywhere to protest. His protests were not peaceful and “non-violent” – they were violent and disruptive, leaving chaos, hatred, and division in their wake. King often allied with openly revolutionary groups, knowing full well that they would provoke violence at his events. King himself was arrested numerous times. Among other things, he was arrested for interfering with police officers in the line of duty and for disobeying injunctions issued against him by the cities he held rallies in. Before his famous march in Washington, D.C., King told the press: “Jail will be the safest place in Washington this spring.”
King’s personal life was one of depravity and debauchery. He was a man of hedonistic excess. He lusted after alcohol and women and indulged himself with plenty of both. It is well-established that King frequently engaged in drunken sex orgies – especially on his road trips. The FBI report contained this account of an “urban leadership” conference hosted by King: “One Negro minister in attendance later expressed his disgust with the behind-the-scenes drinking, fornication, and homosexuality that went on at the conference. Several Negro and white prostitutes were brought in from the Miami area. An all-night sex orgy was held with these prostitutes and some of the delegates in attendance.
“One room had a large table in it which was filled with whiskey. The two Negro prostitutes were paid $50.00 to put on a sex show for the entertainment of guests. A variety of sex acts deviating from the normal were observed.”
These types of despicable orgies were quite normal for King and his entourage. In the report, we find this description of King’s lecherous behavior:
“As early as January, 1964, King engaged in another two-day, drunken sex orgy in Washington, D.C. Many of those present engaged in sexual acts, natural as well as unnatural, for the entertainment of onlookers.
When one of the females shied away from engaging in an unnatural act, King and other of the males present discussed how she was to be taught and initiated in this respect.
“Throughout the ensuing years and until this date King has continued to carry on his sexual aberrations secretly while holding himself out to public view as a moral leader of religious conviction.”
It was not enough that King himself was debauched; he felt the need to coerce women into lesbian acts for his own perverse entertainment. King was not a man of God, unless his god was the lord of the underworld, the instigator of sin, the Father of Lies. King was a hypocrite of the highest order – a charlatan who hoodwinked a nation with his flattering, but pitifully hollow, words.
Martin Luther King, Jr. famously said that we should judge a person by the “content of his character.” I fully agree. We should judge people by their character, not their skin color, race, gender, or any other factor. Actions really do speak louder than words. This is perhaps particularly true for individuals in the public eye who have bestowed upon them a great deal of trust.
If this principle of judging a man by his actions and character is true – as we all know it is – then what does it say about King? What was his true character? Was he the noble justice warrior and righteous reverend we have been told he was, or was he a charlatan, a hypocrite, a drunk, a cheat, and a subversive communist revolutionary? Is the image of King as a good person fighting for right authentic, or is it a methodically managed mirage? Is the portrait of a faith-filled minister preaching the gospel of love and fairness truthful, or is it more accurate to speak of King as an adulterous and deceptive Marxist preaching, through his actions, the gospel of division, discord, and social revolution? You can judge for yourself, but the record is crystal clear.
What hope is there for a world that brainwashes its children into idolizing a man as hypocritical and depraved as Martin Luther King, Jr.? What hope is there for America when she makes a holiday to memorialize a communist provocateur? What hope is there for the rising generation when they grow up believing that a violent, lewd, drunken, cheating communist like MLK “fought for right”?
The Lord Jesus Christ taught that “the truth shall make you free” (John 8:32). How free are you? Have you made the commitment to cling to truth no matter how unpopular or politically incorrect it is? Or do you go along with what the majority believes just so you don’t rock the boat? Are you a watchman on your tower proclaiming the truth unapologetically, or are you like the ostrich with his head buried in the sand? Are we, as a nation, in bondage to this false prophet, the communist martyr Martin Luther King, Jr., or are we honest enough to admit that we were hoodwinked by this carefully crafted communist deception?
The answer to this question is much bigger than Martin Luther King, Jr. – a man whose odious memory will eventually fade into oblivion. Whether we can recognize and admit that a man like King is a charlatan speaks to our level of spiritual discernment as a People. That the majority of people in this country have not yet realized the truth about MLK demonstrates how led by the nose we really are.
Perhaps people tire of me warning of the communist conspiracy, but only the grave will stop me from speaking out because I know the truth and therefore have an obligation to warn others. The fact is that communism has never been more powerful or pervasive than it is today, as the veritable worship of communist agent Martin Luther King, Jr. clearly shows. That little children in rural public schools in Idaho are raising their fists in solidarity with the communist world revolution is a bad omen and an indicator of terrible things to come unless we quickly inject them with a large dose of truth to counter the spread of the communist virus.
In closing, I urge you to accept the truth that Martin Luther King, Jr. was a communist. Embrace the truth that he was a total fraud, a supreme hypocrite, and a debauched sex fiend. Only truth can empower you, whereas clinging to the false façade foisted upon you by the controlled media keeps you in chains.
I have a dream that one day Americans will celebrate the memory of true heroes, honorable men, and authentic martyrs, while shunning the dark legacy of communists, degenerates, and traitors. I have a dream that one day communism, and the horrific pain, suffering, and confusion it causes, will be utterly extinguished from the globe. Perhaps it is only a dream – but it is one I am willing to die fighting for.
https://theamericancitadel.com/2018/01/15/mlk-communist-revolutionary-plagiarizer-degenerate/
Even a stealth Communist revolutionary would NOT try to claim Communism and Christianity would not intermingle and cannot do so, citing irreconcilable differences, however, which is exactly what MLK stated here: http://teachingamericanhistory.org/library/document/can-a-christian-be-a-communist/. I know if I were a closet communist, I would not DARE try to claim that Communism and Christianity would not see eye to eye, precisely BECAUSE I’d realize that destroys any potential propaganda value by claiming otherwise. That’s why I am NOT calling him a Communist revolutionary, stealth or otherwise, any more than Abraham Lincoln might be one just for interacting with Karl Marx via letters, or Richard Nixon is one for aligning his country with Mao Zedong during the 1970s. At most, he’s a dupe, a useful idiot (if anything, I’d be more on the mark to say George Lucas is a closet communist). If anything, stealth Communist revolutionaries would try to paint Communism and Christianity as being one and the same without openly stating they adhere to Communism for obvious reasons. Just look at the guy who introduced Hillary Clinton to Saul Alinsky, for example, or Pope Francis, or the whole “Liberation Theology” thing, or Angela Merkel’s dad, who actually was one of the few German Christians to outright cross over to East Berlin when most were trying to flee to West Berlin. Heck, even Vladimir Putin, who at least tries to paint himself as distancing himself from Communism however thinly and poses as a Christian man, nonetheless had the audacity to claim that Vladimir Lenin’s relics and Communist statutes were comparable to Christian relics and the Ten Commandments. I’m pretty sure if MLK were a closet Communist, he would have been saying Christianity and Communism would work together. And I’m all too familiar with leftist lies, like how Che Guevara is painted as a hero and all of that, or how the only reason Castro became Communist was because of us mean Americans (when in reality, he was Communist long before we tried to stop him).
My point in even bringing up Thomas Jefferson at all was to show that there are plenty of individuals who committed similar bad things, on the topic of communism, and in the case of Jefferson, he actually COULD qualify as an open communist today just by his open and fanatical support for the Jacobins. I could have just as easily cited Abraham Lincoln as well since there was talk that he actually corresponded with Karl Marx and how his party actually backed Marx in his heyday, or heck, even Richard Nixon backing Communist China, and that guy was definitely anti-Communist. One thing I demand for when criticizing MLK is being consistent. I know if I were them and I wanted to bash MLK for ties to Communists, I would do the exact same thing with Thomas Jefferson, Abraham Lincoln, even Richard Nixon (and I have complete respect towards the latter even WITH his unfortunate support Mao Zedong).
Besides, why on earth would MLK meet with Nixon at all, let alone give glowing praise for him, if he were a closet communist? Let’s not forget, Nixon is well known for his role in putting down that Communist traitor Alger Hiss during the McCarthy hearings, and most of the far left at the very least wanted to tarnish his reputation if not outright kill him for that. That’s even part of the reason why Watergate happened, as revenge for Alger Hiss? I’m pretty sure if MLK was far-left, he would have gone out of his way to condemn Nixon and even demand for his execution, like other far-left members who even had the audacity to claim that they’re patriots like Harry Truman, all while of course denying he was a Communist.
Amen.